Learning Path Recommendation via Vector Magnitude Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Learning Management Systems (LMS) and Online Homework Systems (OHS) lack personalized learning paths that adapt to individual students' learning styles, past performance, and preferences, leading to inefficient resource allocation and learning outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that identify a student's initial position within a learning object network, calculate multiple learning paths with varying magnitudes and strengths based on student context, and recommend the most effective path by comparing these metrics to provide personalized learning recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a standardized curriculum is provided to all students, then resource allocation is simplified, but learning efficiency and student outcomes deteriorate due to lack of personalization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by calculating multiple learning paths with varying magnitudes and strengths based on student context, and dynamically selecting the optimal path by comparing these metrics rather than using a fixed standardized curriculum

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system makes the learning path dynamic by enabling adaptation to individual student capabilities and preferences through personalized recommendations, allowing the curriculum to adjust automatically based on student context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If personalized learning paths are implemented, then learning efficiency and student outcomes improve, but system complexity and computational requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves personalization by changing parameters through calculating multiple learning paths with varying magnitudes and strengths, then selecting the optimal path based on comparing these calculated metrics rather than requiring complex adaptive algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the learning content into discrete learning objects connected by learning vectors, allowing personalized path selection through combinatorial optimization rather than requiring a completely customized curriculum for each student

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If multiple learning paths are calculated and compared, then learning path optimization improves, but computational time and processing resources worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath selection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes path selection by changing parameters through calculating magnitudes and strengths for multiple paths, then comparing these parameters to identify the optimal learning path with highest accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial action by calculating and comparing only the necessary parameters (magnitude and strength) for path selection rather than analyzing all possible attributes of each learning path, reducing computational overhead while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9406239B2Vector-based learning path
Publication Date: 2016.08.02 PEARSON EDUCATION INC
  • US9406239B2 patent drawing
  • US9406239B2 patent drawing
  • US9406239B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method/apparatus/system for learning path recommendation based on student and learning vector context is disclosed. The incident learning object and the target learning object are identified. Learning paths between the incident learning object and the target learning object are identified, which learning paths each include a plurality of learning objects and learning vectors. A magnitude is calculated for the learning paths, which magnitude is based on the sum of the magnitudes of the learning vectors in each learning path. The magnitudes of the learning paths are compared, and one of the learning paths is selected based on the comparison of the learning paths and provided to a student.