Learning Problem Generation Using Multiple Language Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional learning approaches fail to provide personalized and efficient learning experiences by generating one-size-fits-all explanations that do not consider a user's learning level, requiring users to search for analogous problems manually.

Innovation Solution

A method and system using multiple language models to generate customized solution explanations and analogous learning problems based on a user's learning level, employing an information acquisition unit, solution explanation generation unit, and learning problem generation unit to create tailored learning experiences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional one-size-fits-all explanations are used for learning problems, then the system complexity is low, but the learning effectiveness and adaptability to user's learning level deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by using multiple language models with different characteristics (e.g., different reasoning capabilities, explanation styles) to generate solution explanations that are adapted to the user's learning level. The selection and configuration of language models are adjusted based on problem difficulty and user profile, enabling personalized learning without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The explanation generation process is segmented into multiple independent language models that can be selectively applied. Each language model handles specific aspects of problem solving or explanation generation, allowing the system to compose tailored explanations by combining outputs from different models based on the user's needs and the problem type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple language models are used to generate customized solution explanations, then the adaptability to user's learning level is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to learning levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple language models serve universal functions of generating explanations, but each model contributes different strengths (e.g., one excels at step-by-step reasoning, another at conceptual explanations). This multi-functionality allows the system to adapt to various learning levels and problem types using a standardized multi-model framework, reducing the need for separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary component selects and coordinates the output from multiple language models based on the user's learning level and problem characteristics. This mediator manages the complexity by providing a unified interface that translates diverse model outputs into appropriate personalized explanations, shielding the user from the underlying system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If customized solution explanations are generated using multiple language models, then the learning effectiveness is enhanced, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning effectivenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively using one or more language models based on the problem difficulty and user needs. For simpler problems or users with higher learning levels, fewer models are invoked, reducing processing time. For complex problems or beginners, the full set of models is used to generate comprehensive explanations, ensuring learning effectiveness is maintained when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the problem and user profile before selecting which language models to invoke. This preliminary action allows the system to pre-determine the appropriate level of explanation detail and model selection, avoiding unnecessary computational overhead and reducing processing time by not deploying all models for every query.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If analogous learning problems are generated using multiple language models, then the versatility of learning content is improved, but the productivity in terms of problem generation speed may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveversatility of learning contentVSAvoidproblem generation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple language models are merged to generate analogous learning problems, where each model contributes to different aspects of problem generation (e.g., problem statement, solution steps, explanation). The combined output from these models creates more versatile and diverse learning content by leveraging the strengths of each model, producing richer problem sets that cover various learning angles and approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250111798A1Method and System for Generating Learning Problems
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 MATA EDU INC
  • US20250111798A1 patent drawing
  • US20250111798A1 patent drawing
  • US20250111798A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for generating learning problems is provided. The method includes the steps of: acquiring a first learning problem; generating a first solution explanation with reference to the first learning problem using a first language model, and generating a second solution explanation with reference to the first learning problem using a second language model; and generating a second learning problem with reference to at least one of the first solution explanation and the second solution explanation.