Least-Privilege Permission Profiles via Iterative Vector Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing the principle of least privilege in modern computing platforms, especially cloud-based systems, is challenging due to the complexity of permissions, and existing solutions struggle when usage data is missing or incomplete, leading to vulnerabilities in network security.

Innovation Solution

An iterative process to develop least-privilege profiles for network entities by evaluating permission vectors based on their sufficiency, number of entries, similarity to approved vectors, and other predefined rules, iteratively reducing permissions until a termination condition is met, thereby identifying a minimal valid set of permissions without relying on incomplete usage data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If existing solutions analyze usage data to extract least privilege permissions, then permission management can be automated, but the solutions fail when usage data is missing or incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of least privilege permission extractionVSAvoidreliability of permission extraction when usage data is incomplete
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting usage data over time and pre-computing least privilege permission sets before security incidents occur. This allows the system to have ready-made, validated permission configurations that don't depend on complete real-time usage data, resolving the contradiction between automation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where permission assignments are continuously monitored and evaluated. When usage patterns are observed or when permission effectiveness is measured, the system adjusts and refines the least privilege permission sets, ensuring reliability even when initial usage data is incomplete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If strong privileged credentials are granted to users for resource access, then users can perform necessary actions, but the resources become vulnerable to security breaches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability of users to perform actionsVSAvoidvulnerability to security breaches
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by assigning different permission levels to different users and resources based on specific needs. Instead of uniform privileged access, each user receives precisely the minimum permissions required for their specific tasks, eliminating unnecessary vulnerability while maintaining operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes permission parameters based on user identity, resource type, and task requirements. By adjusting the scope and level of permissions as parameters rather than granting fixed strong credentials, the system maintains ease of operation while reducing security vulnerability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the principle of least privilege is implemented in modern computing platforms, then network security is enhanced, but the complexity of managing large amounts of permissions makes it impractical for human IT managers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork securityVSAvoidcomplexity of permission management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically generating, assigning, and managing least privilege permission sets without human intervention. The automated system monitors usage patterns and adjusts permissions autonomously, maintaining high security while eliminating the management complexity that makes the principle impractical for human IT managers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses strong algorithmic processes and automated analysis tools that rapidly process and evaluate permission configurations. This accelerated computational approach handles the complexity of large permission sets efficiently, maintaining security enhancements while removing the manual management burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #38Strong oxidants (Accelerated oxidation)

Data Source

PatentUS11943228B2Developing least-privilege permission sets based on global optimization
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 CYBER ARK SOFTWARE LTD
  • US11943228B2 patent drawing
  • US11943228B2 patent drawing
  • US11943228B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed embodiments relate to iteratively developing profiles for network entities. Operations may include accessing a set of permissions associated with a network entity; obtaining a set of permission vectors for the network entity based on the set of permissions; evaluating each permission vector within the set of permission vectors for iteratively developing a profile for the network entity, the evaluation being based on at least: whether each permission vector within the set of permission vectors provides sufficient privileges for the network entity to perform an action, and a predefined rule; creating a new set of permission vectors for the network entity based on at least the selected group of the set of permission vectors; iterating the evaluation for the new set of permission vectors; determining whether an iteration termination condition has been met; and terminating the iteration based on the iteration termination condition being met.