Lecture Capture Privacy Protection via Positional Subject Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies for protecting the privacy of subjects in lecture capture systems are inadequate, as they may incorrectly apply mosaic processing to the lecturer's face or fail to protect the privacy of auditors, and require costly registration of face images for all lecturers.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that identifies non-processing target subjects based on positional relationships or posture information within a dynamic image, and applies predetermined image processing only to processing target subjects, thereby ensuring accurate privacy protection for subjects other than the main subject.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mosaic processing is applied to protect privacy of subjects in lecture capture systems, then privacy protection is improved, but the lecturer's face may be incorrectly processed or registration costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protection accuracyVSAvoidface image registration system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image processing task by identifying and separating the lecturer from other subjects based on positional relationships. The controller determines which subject is the lecturer by analyzing position information and applies different processing rules: no mosaic processing for the lecturer, but mosaic processing for other subjects. This segmentation approach eliminates the need for comprehensive face registration while maintaining accurate privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by treating different subjects differently based on their positional characteristics. The image processing apparatus applies mosaic processing only to specific local regions (other subjects) while excluding the lecturer's face from processing. This selective application of processing quality resolves the contradiction by protecting privacy where needed without incorrectly processing the lecturer or requiring full registration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If face size is used to determine main subject, then main subject identification is simplified, but lecturer may be incorrectly identified when face size is not larger than auditors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemain subject identificationVSAvoidmain subject identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces position information as an intermediary factor to determine the main subject. Instead of relying solely on face size, the system uses the lecturer's positional relationship with the camera and other subjects as a mediating criterion. The controller uses this intermediary position data to accurately identify the lecturer even when face size does not distinguish them from auditors, resolving the contradiction between simple identification and accurate identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12272090B2Information processing apparatus, and information processing method
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US12272090B2 patent drawing
  • US12272090B2 patent drawing
  • US12272090B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes: a controller that identifies a non-processing target subject, among multiple subjects in a frame included in a dynamic image, as a non-processing target that is not subjected to predetermined image processing, on a basis of positional relationships between multiple subject areas corresponding to the respective multiple subjects and a specific area in the frame; and an image processor that performs the predetermined image processing on a processing target area corresponding to a processing target subject other than the non-processing target subject, among the multiple subjects.