LED Die Reflector Layout for Higher Optical Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing LEDs struggle to maximize luminous flux due to limitations in reflectivity and optical efficiency, particularly in the geometry and size of contact regions and reflective elements within the die structure.

Innovation Solution

A die structure featuring a highly reflective metal reflector covering most of the die area, including mesa-bottom regions, and incorporating a Distributed Bragg Reflector (DBR) that extends over most of the die areas, enhancing reflectivity and optical efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the contact region size at n Vias and e Vias is increased, then the electrical connectivity is improved, but the reflectivity and optical efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical connectivityVSAvoidoptical efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The die structure is segmented into distinct functional regions: contact regions for electrical connectivity and reflective regions for optical efficiency. The contact regions are specifically positioned at the periphery or bottom surfaces, while the majority of the die area is dedicated to reflective elements, creating spatial separation between electrical and optical functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the die are assigned different properties: contact regions have high electrical conductivity, while the majority of the die area has high reflectivity. This local differentiation allows each region to optimize its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the reflective elements size is increased, then the luminous flux is improved, but the contact region area is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveluminous fluxVSAvoidcontact region area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The reflective elements extend into the vertical dimension, covering the top surface and extending down the sidewalls of the die structure. This three-dimensional reflective geometry allows maximum light reflection without compromising the horizontal contact region area at the base of the die.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The die structure is segmented into distinct functional regions: contact regions for electrical connectivity and reflective regions for optical efficiency. The contact regions are specifically positioned at the periphery or bottom surfaces, while the majority of the die area is dedicated to reflective elements, creating spatial separation between electrical and optical functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of energy

If the openings size in die geometry is reduced, then the reflectivity is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereflectivityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The die structure employs composite materials and multi-layer construction, combining semiconductor layers with metallic reflective coatings and dielectric materials. This composite approach enables complex three-dimensional reflective geometries to be manufactured using standard semiconductor fabrication processes like sputtering and chemical vapor deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The reflective elements are formed as part of the semiconductor device fabrication process itself, using preliminary deposition and patterning steps integrated into the manufacturing flow. This preliminary formation of reflective structures during fabrication simplifies the overall manufacturing process compared to post-fabrication assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly increases the luminous flux of LEDs by improving reflectivity and optical efficiency, leading to enhanced performance and practical usefulness in automotive and general illumination applications.

Implementation Method 1

a highly reflective metal reflector that covers most of the die area including the mesa-bottom regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

The reflectivity is further enhanced with the incorporation of a DBR that further extends over most of the die areas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBragg Diffraction: Bragg Diffraction

Data Source

PatentUS20250169251A1LED with metal reflector
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 LUMILEDS LLC
  • US20250169251A1 patent drawing
  • US20250169251A1 patent drawing
  • US20250169251A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and devices including a die with a plurality of metal reflectors and/or a distributed bragg reflector (DBR) may improve optical efficiency and/or reflectivity of the system. The metal reflectors may be highly reflective and cover most of the die area including at least most of the n-contact areas. The DBR may also cover most of the die areas. Reflectivity may be improved as a result of one or both of these elements. Additionally, a transparent conductive oxide layer may cover the n-contact areas to improve current spreading.