LED Driver Inrush Current Limiter with Bypass Switch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional LED drivers malfunction and cause undesirable interactions, such as audible noise and flicker, when handling high inrush currents from AC conductive angle modulated voltages, which are not well-suited for LEDs.

Innovation Solution

An LED driver with a current limit resistor and a bypass switch is implemented to limit inrush current to a maximum level, using a delay network and snubber network to control the bypass switch, ensuring the current remains within safe limits while efficiently charging capacitors and filtering out high-frequency noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If AC conductive angle modulated voltages are used to power LED drivers, then power delivery capability is improved, but inrush current increases causing driver malfunction and audible noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery capabilityVSAvoidinrush current
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The bypass switch is pre-configured in parallel with the current limit resistor, and the delay network is pre-set to activate the bypass switch after a predetermined time period. This preliminary arrangement allows the system to quickly respond to inrush current conditions without requiring complex real-time decision-making circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The delay network acts as an intermediary between the power input and the bypass switch control. It introduces a time delay that allows the inrush current to subside before the bypass switch is activated, thereby mediating the conflict between immediate power delivery and inrush current suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a current limit resistor is used to limit inrush current, then driver reliability is improved, but power loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver reliabilityVSAvoidpower loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions from a static current limiting state to a bypass state. The bypass switch, controlled by the delay network, dynamically alters the circuit configuration to eliminate the resistive power loss after the initial inrush current period, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing ongoing energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The current limiting function operates periodically rather than continuously. The delay network creates a time-based periodic action where the current limit resistor is effective only during the initial inrush period, followed by a bypass phase where normal power flow resumes without resistive loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Power

If AC conductive angle modulated voltages are used, then power delivery is improved, but flicker and audible noise occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower deliveryVSAvoidflicker and audible noise
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the harmful inrush current phenomenon into a beneficial timing signal. The delay network uses the presence of inrush current (the harmful factor) to trigger the bypass switch activation, thereby transforming the problematic electrical condition into a useful control signal that eliminates subsequent flicker and noise issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively limits inrush current, preventing driver malfunction and noise, while maintaining efficient operation and reducing flicker, ensuring stable power delivery to LEDs.

Implementation Method 1

A current limiting device, such as a resistive device, is placed within an input current path of the switching converter to limit inrush current to a predetermined maximum current level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Resistance: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 2

A bypass switch coupled in parallel with the current limiting device is controlled to at least partially bypass the current limiting device in response to rising voltage of an input current path while maintaining the input current at or below the maximum current level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 3

A delay network is provided to delay activation of the bypass switch in response to rising voltage of the input current path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime Delay:

Implementation Method 4

A snubber network is provided to suppress voltage spikes that may occur when the bypass switch is activated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSnubber Effect:

Data Source

PatentUS8339055B2Inrush current limiter for an LED driver
Publication Date: 2012.12.25 INTERSIL AMERICAS INC
  • US8339055B2 patent drawing
  • US8339055B2 patent drawing
  • US8339055B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inrush current limiter for use with an LED driver including a current limiting device, a bypass switch device, and a switch drive. The current limiting device is placed in the input current path of the LED driver to limit input current to a predetermined maximum level in response to an AC conductive angle modulated voltage. The bypass switch device is coupled in parallel with the current limit device. The switch drive turns on the bypass switch device to at least partially bypass the current limiting device as a voltage level of an input of a switching converter rises. The input current remains sufficiently high without exceeding the maximum level. The switch drive is implemented with a delay network driven either by a separate transformer winding or by a snubber network. The delay network may have a delay based on the delay caused by the current limiting device.