LED Driver Switching Frequency Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current LED drivers face inefficiencies due to uncontrolled switching losses in switched mode power converters, which affect the overall efficiency of LED-based lighting applications.

Innovation Solution

An LED driver with a back end module using a switch mode power converter operating in self-oscillating current control mode, where a control unit determines and maintains a minimal switching frequency and modulates the duty cycle to manage the supply current, reducing switching losses by operating the switch at a substantially constant frequency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the SMPS operates in self-oscillating current control mode, then the control is simple and responsive, but the switching frequency varies causing increased switching losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidswitching losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning the SMPS from a static self-oscillating mode to a dynamic voltage control mode where the control unit actively adjusts the switching frequency and duty cycle based on real-time conditions. This allows the system to maintain optimal switching frequency while preserving the simplicity of current control through duty cycle modulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating parameters of the SMPS by switching from self-oscillating frequency determination to a controlled frequency mode. The control unit determines and maintains a minimal switching frequency, and modulates the duty cycle to maintain the supply current at a desired level, thereby reducing switching losses while keeping control simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If the switching frequency is reduced to minimize switching losses, then energy efficiency improves, but the current control responsiveness may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching lossesVSAvoidcurrent control responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the control unit to continuously monitor the supply current and adjust the duty cycle accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures that even at reduced switching frequency, the current control remains responsive and accurate, as the duty cycle is dynamically modulated to maintain the desired current level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses periodic action through duty cycle modulation at the determined minimal switching frequency. This periodic control approach allows the system to maintain effective current control while operating at an optimized switching frequency that minimizes switching losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the SMPS operates at variable switching frequency in self-oscillating mode, then the system adapts to load conditions, but switching losses increase due to uncontrolled frequency variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload adaptationVSAvoidswitching losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the frequency parameter from variable self-oscillating to a controlled minimal switching frequency determined by the control unit. This parameter change allows the system to maintain adaptability to load conditions through duty cycle modulation while preventing uncontrolled frequency variations that cause excessive switching losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the self-oscillating mechanical frequency determination with an electronic control mechanism. The control unit electronically determines and maintains the switching frequency, replacing the inherent oscillatory behavior with a controlled signal that adapts to load conditions while minimizing switching losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11626793B2LED driver and method of operating an LED driver
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 ELDOLAB HLDG BV
  • US11626793B2 patent drawing
  • US11626793B2 patent drawing
  • US11626793B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An LED driver is described, the LED driver comprising:a back end module BE comprising a switch mode power converter SMPS configured to operate in a self-oscillating current control mode, the back end module BE further comprising:an input terminal configured to receive a DC bus voltage;an output terminal configured to output a supply current for powering an LED fixture;a control unit configured to control the back end module to operate the SMPS in a voltage control mode by:determining a switching frequency of the SMPS when operating in the self-oscillating current control mode;determining a minimal switching frequency of the SMPS andreceiving an input signal representative of the supply current for powering the LED fixture;wherein the control unit is further configured to control the switch of the SMPS in the voltage control mode by:operating the switch of the SMPS at a substantially constant frequency based on the determined minimal switching frequency andmodulating a duty cycle of the switch to maintain the supply current at a desired current.