Light-Emitting Device Emission Layer Dipole Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current organic light-emitting devices face limitations in luminescence efficiency, lifespan, and roll-off ratio due to inefficiencies in the movement and interaction of holes and electrons within the emission layer.

Innovation Solution

A light-emitting device is designed with a specific emission layer composition including multiple hosts, a sensitizer, and a fluorescent emitter, where the hosts and sensitizer are differentiated, and their permanent dipole moments are optimized to minimize sensitizer aggregation and maximize Förster energy transfer, leading to enhanced luminescence efficiency and lifespan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a conventional emission layer with single host or simple composition is used, then the device structure is simple and manufacturing is easier, but luminescence efficiency and lifespan are limited due to inefficiencies in hole and electron interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission layer compositionVSAvoidluminescence efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The emission layer uses a composite material system comprising multiple hosts (first host and second host with different properties), a sensitizer, and a fluorescent emitter. This composite structure enables synergistic effects where the first host facilitates hole transport and the second host facilitates electron transport, improving luminescence efficiency and device lifespan while managing complexity through functional differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the emission layer are assigned different functional qualities: the first host is optimized for hole transport with appropriate HOMO levels, the second host is optimized for electron transport with appropriate LUMO levels, the sensitizer is positioned to receive energy from both carriers, and the fluorescent emitter is configured for optimal light output. This local functional differentiation resolves the contradiction by optimizing each component for its specific role.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If sensitizer concentration is increased to improve energy transfer, then luminescence efficiency improves, but sensitizer aggregation occurs leading to reduced device performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveluminescence efficiencyVSAvoidsensitizer aggregation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The sensitizer acts as an intermediary component that receives energy from both holes (via the first host) and electrons (via the second host), then transfers this energy to the fluorescent emitter. By positioning the sensitizer as a mediating layer between the host materials and the emitter, the system achieves efficient energy transfer without requiring high sensitizer concentrations that would cause aggregation. The sensitizer's dipole moment is specifically optimized to facilitate this intermediary energy transfer function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If host materials with high dipole moments are used to enhance charge transport, then charge mobility improves, but Förster energy transfer efficiency decreases due to dipole moment mismatch with sensitizer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge mobilityVSAvoidFörster energy transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The dipole moments of the host materials are specifically optimized within certain ranges to balance two competing requirements: sufficiently high dipole moments to enable effective charge transport and mobility, but not so high that they create a mismatch with the sensitizer's dipole moment. This parameter optimization ensures that Förster energy transfer remains efficient while maintaining good charge transport properties. The first host and second host are assigned different dipole moment characteristics suited to their respective hole and electron transport functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized emission layer structure achieves improved luminescence efficiency and lifespan, resulting in a high-quality electronic apparatus with better performance characteristics.

Implementation Method 1

maximize Förster energy transfer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFörster energy transfer:

Implementation Method 2

The excitons may transition from an excited state to a ground state, resulting in light emission

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroluminescence: Electroluminescence

Data Source

PatentUS20240251583A1Light-emitting device and electronic apparatus including the same
Publication Date: 2024.07.25 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US20240251583A1 patent drawing
  • US20240251583A1 patent drawing
  • US20240251583A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A light-emitting device and an electronic apparatus including the light-emitting device. The light-emitting device includes a first electrode, a second electrode, and an interlayer arranged between the first electrode and the second electrode, the interlayer includes an emission layer, the emission layer includes one or more m1 hosts, a sensitizer, and a fluorescent emitter, where m1 is an integer of 1 or more, and when m1 is 2 or more, the two or more hosts are each different from the other, the one or more m1 hosts, the sensitizer, and the fluorescent emitter are different from each other, and Expression 1 is satisfied.0⁢ debye≤<semantics definitionURL="">❘<annotation encoding="Mathematica">"\[LeftBracketingBar]"</annotation></semantics>PDM⁡(S)-PDM⁡(H)<semantics definitionURL="">❘<annotation encoding="Mathematica">"\[RightBracketingBar]"</annotation></semantics>≤3⁢ debyeExpression⁢ 1Expression 1 is the same as described in the present specification.