LED Obstruction Lighting with Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional obstruction lights and anti-collision lights face challenges such as limited service life, light pollution, and inefficiencies in light distribution, and have not evolved to actively participate in collision avoidance, particularly in densely populated areas with increasing infrastructure and hazards.

Innovation Solution

A lighting system utilizing LEDs oriented at 45° relative to a reflector with a conic cross-section, which minimizes downward light emission, enhances beam focus, and includes a collision avoidance system that detects potential threats and alerts vehicles through radio, aural, or visual signals, using sensors and an awareness engine to adjust light characteristics and intensity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If incandescent lamps are used in obstruction lights, then the light output is sufficient, but the service life is limited and replacement is frequent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice lifeVSAvoidlamp replacement frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from incandescent lamp technology to LED technology, fundamentally changing the light source parameters. LEDs provide the same or superior light output with significantly extended service life (50,000+ hours versus 1,000-2,000 hours for incandescent), eliminating the need for frequent replacements and improving system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/electrical incandescent lamp system with a solid-state LED system. This substitution eliminates fragile filaments and complex electrical connections, resulting in a more reliable, maintenance-free light source that requires no replacement under normal operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Shape

If LEDs are oriented vertically aimed outwardly, then the beam shape is continuous, but the LED junctions are vulnerable to lightning damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam continuityVSAvoidlightning vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional LED orientation by mounting LEDs horizontally and aiming them upward at the reflector rather than vertically outward. This inversion positions the LED junctions away from direct lightning strike zones while the reflector redirects light horizontally, maintaining beam continuity while improving electrical component protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The reflector serves as an intermediary element that receives light from horizontally-oriented LEDs and redirects it horizontally to form the required continuous beam. This intermediary arrangement decouples the LED orientation from the final beam direction, allowing LEDs to be protected from lightning while still producing the required optical output

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Temperature

If LEDs are aimed downwardly, then cooling is more efficient, but light is directed toward the neighborhood causing light pollution

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLED cooling efficiencyVSAvoidlight pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reflector acts as an intermediary that receives light from downward-aimed LEDs and redirects it horizontally outward. This allows the LEDs to maintain their downward orientation for optimal thermal management while the reflector prevents direct light emission toward the neighborhood, eliminating light pollution while preserving cooling efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The lighting system segments the functions of light generation and light direction. LEDs are responsible solely for light production and self-cooling, while the reflector handles light redirection. This functional segmentation allows each component to operate in its optimal orientation without compromising the other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Illumination intensity

If conventional obstruction lights are used, then the light output is sufficient, but light pollution occurs outside the specified band

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight outputVSAvoidlight pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality control by using individual LED emitters with specific color temperatures and the refector to concentrate light output into a narrow vertical beam spread (3 degrees or less). This ensures high illumination intensity within the required band while minimizing light emission outside the specified angular range, thereby reducing light pollution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides efficient, long-lasting, and reduced light pollution while actively aiding collision avoidance by dynamically adjusting light output and alerting drivers to potential hazards, enhancing safety in densely populated areas.

Implementation Method 1

The reflecting surfaces redirect and collimate a light output of the plurality of LEDs at an angle of about 45° with respect to the central light emitting axis of the plurality of LEDs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS10532826B2Lighting and collision alerting system
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 HUGHEY & PHILLIPS LLC
  • US10532826B2 patent drawing
  • US10532826B2 patent drawing
  • US10532826B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A collision avoidance system includes a sensor adapted to detect at least one vehicle in the vicinity of a predetermined area and generate target data relating to the at least one vehicle. An awareness engine receives the target data and evaluates the target data for a threat of a collision. An alerting system is adapted to alert the at least one vehicle in the event of a threat of a collision, the alerting system being activated by the awareness engine.