LED Wafer Surface Morphology Optimization via Etching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional LEDs suffer from poor light extraction efficiency, requiring expensive equipment or long processing times to improve, which is undesirable for financial and performance reasons.

Innovation Solution

The method involves optimizing the surface morphology of an LED wafer by forming a roughened surface through etching processes, using a conformal laser scanning microscope to measure and adjust the root-mean-square (RMS) surface roughness to achieve maximum light output, thereby enhancing light extraction efficiency without the need for expensive tools or prolonged processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional LED fabrication processes are used, then manufacturing is simple and fast, but light extraction efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication simplicityVSAvoidlight extraction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying etching process parameters (etchant concentration, etching time, temperature) to optimize surface roughness. By changing these parameters, the invention achieves improved light extraction efficiency through controlled surface morphology modification while maintaining a relatively simple fabrication process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If expensive equipment is used to improve light extraction efficiency, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight extraction efficiencyVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs cheap, readily available chemical etchants and standard wet etching equipment instead of expensive specialized tools. The process uses conventional laboratory equipment that can be found in most fabrication facilities, thereby improving light extraction efficiency without increasing device complexity or requiring expensive equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces complex mechanical or specialized equipment-based solutions with a chemical etching process. By using chemical reactions to modify surface morphology rather than mechanical machining or specialized apparatus, the patent achieves improved light extraction efficiency with simpler equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If conventional etching processes are used, then processing is fast, but surface roughness control is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsurface roughness control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by measuring surface roughness (RMS value) and using this information to adjust subsequent etching parameters. The process involves measuring the surface after etching, comparing the RMS value to target values, and modifying etching conditions accordingly to achieve optimal surface roughness control while maintaining efficient processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies dynamics by making the etching process adaptive rather than static. Process parameters such as etching time and etchant concentration are dynamically adjusted based on measured surface roughness values, allowing the process to respond to variations and achieve precise surface roughness control while maintaining overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for LEDs with close to maximum light extraction efficiency, reducing processing costs and time by enabling wafer-level surface roughness measurement and adjustment, resulting in improved optical power output.

Implementation Method 1

investigating, using a laser scanning microscope, an actual surface morphology of the LED wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

forming a roughened surface through etching processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEtching:

Data Source

PatentUS9324624B2Optimizing light extraction efficiency for an LED wafer
Publication Date: 2016.04.26 ENNOSTAR CORP
  • US9324624B2 patent drawing
  • US9324624B2 patent drawing
  • US9324624B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure involves a method of fabricating a light-emitting diode (LED) wafer. The method first determines a target surface morphology for the LED wafer. The target surface morphology yields a maximum light output for LEDs on the LED wafer. The LED wafer is etched to form a roughened wafer surface. Thereafter, using a laser scanning microscope, the method investigates an actual surface morphology of the LED wafer. Afterwards, if the actual surface morphology differs from the target surface morphology beyond an acceptable limit, the method repeats the etching step one or more times. The etching is repeated by adjusting one or more etching parameters.