General Ledger Journal Entry Flagging via Composite Risk Scoring
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Large general ledgers become difficult to manage and analyze for irregularities, such as fraud, due to their complexity, and existing audit systems may miss irregularities, especially when sophisticated offenders conceal their actions by modifying procedures.
Innovation Solution
A method and system that execute assessment routines on transaction lines to generate base scores, which are then combined into composite scores, flagging journal entries that exceed thresholds, allowing for the identification of potentially fraudulent transactions that may not be individually suspicious but collectively indicate higher risk.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If only traditional single-threshold assessment routines are used to flag journal entries, then the system is simple to operate, but it fails to identify sophisticated fraud that conceals actions by modifying individual transaction characteristics
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines multiple assessment routines into a composite scoring system. Each routine evaluates different aspects of transactions (e.g., amount, timing, account patterns), and their scores are aggregated into a composite risk score. This merging approach enables the system to detect sophisticated fraud that evades individual assessment criteria by considering multiple dimensions simultaneously.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a composite scoring dimension that aggregates results from multiple assessment routines. Instead of relying on single-threshold binary decisions, the system creates a multi-dimensional risk assessment space where transactions are evaluated across several criteria. This dimensional expansion allows detection of fraud patterns that distribute risk across individual criteria but concentrate in the composite view.
2Measurement precision
If multiple assessment routines with composite scoring are implemented, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but the analysis time and computational resources increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a tiered assessment approach where the composite scoring mechanism processes all transactions systematically, but flagging for detailed review occurs only when composite scores exceed thresholds. This partial action principle allows comprehensive risk evaluation without requiring manual review of every transaction, optimizing the balance between thoroughness and efficiency.
Solution Approach 2:
The system automatically performs composite score calculations and threshold comparisons without requiring human intervention for each transaction. The automated multi-routine assessment and composite scoring mechanism serves itself by systematically evaluating all transactions and identifying flags, reducing manual audit time while maintaining comprehensive analysis.
3Reliability
If comprehensive composite scoring is applied to all journal entries, then all instances of irregularity can be identified, but the complexity of managing and analyzing the general ledger increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the complex task of fraud detection into multiple independent assessment routines, each evaluating specific transaction characteristics. These routines are further organized into base scoring components that feed into the composite score. This segmentation reduces management complexity by breaking down the overall system into manageable, independently configurable modules while maintaining comprehensive coverage.
Data Source
AI summary
A method for flagging journal entries within a general ledger is described. A plurality of assessment routines are executed on transaction lines of the journal entries within the general ledger, each assessment routine of the plurality of assessment routines i) being configured to generate a base score for each transaction line, and ii) associated with a corresponding flagging threshold. A composite score is generated for each transaction line using the base scores generated by the plurality of assessment routines. For each journal entry within the general ledger: the journal entry is flagged when one or more base scores for the journal entry exceed the corresponding flagging thresholds of the assessment routines, or when none of the base scores for the journal entry exceed the corresponding flagging thresholds and the composite score exceeds a composite threshold. A report of flagged journal entries is generated.