Left Atrial Appendage Closure Framework for Adaptive Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical devices for closing the left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation are inadequate in effectively preventing thrombi formation and migration, leading to stroke or heart attack risks.

Innovation Solution

A left atrial appendage closure device with an expandable framework of struts, transitioning through various positions to conform to the atrial appendage geometry, is deployed using a delivery sheath, allowing sequential exposure and expansion to achieve secure sealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the expandable framework is fully constrained by the delivery sheath, then the device maintains a compact delivery profile, but the framework cannot expand to conform to the atrial appendage geometry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery profile sizeVSAvoidconformability to atrial appendage geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The expandable framework is nested within the delivery sheath in a compressed state, allowing the device to maintain a compact delivery profile while being delivered through vasculature. Upon deployment, the framework expands from its nested configuration to conform to the atrial appendage geometry, resolving the contradiction between compact delivery and adaptive expansion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the struts are configured with multiple bends and segments, then the device can conform to complex atrial appendage geometries, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric conformityVSAvoidnumber of segments and bends
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The framework is divided into multiple struts with specific bend configurations, where each strut segment serves a functional purpose in achieving geometric conformity. The segmentation allows the device to adapt to complex atrial appendage geometries while maintaining manufacturability through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the framework expands to fully unconstrained position, then the sealing effectiveness is maximized, but the risk of device migration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectivenessVSAvoiddevice position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The framework is pre-configured with specific bend angles and segment orientations that guide its expansion into the desired final configuration. This preliminary geometric design ensures that when the framework expands to its unconstrained position, it automatically achieves optimal sealing while maintaining positional stability through its predetermined geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12383278B2Left atrial appendage closure device
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED INC
  • US12383278B2 patent drawing
  • US12383278B2 patent drawing
  • US12383278B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A left atrial appendage closure device may include an expandable framework having a plurality of struts joined at a proximal and distal hub. When the framework is fully constrained in a first position, a first segment of struts extends distally from the distal hub parallel to a central longitudinal axis to a first bend and a second segment of struts extends from the first bend proximally. A first amount of the framework is unconstrained in a second position, where the first segment extends distally from the distal hub parallel to the central longitudinal axis to the first bend, the second segment extends from the first bend proximally and radially outward to a second bend, a third segment of struts extends from the second bend proximally and radially inward to a third bend, and a fourth segment of struts extends from the third bend proximally to within the delivery sheath.