Left Atrial Electrode Restraint for Low-Energy AFIB Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pacemaker wires are not used on the left side of the heart due to the risk of thrombus detachment causing strokes, and defibrillators require high energy leading to patient discomfort and battery wear, while existing AFIB detection and treatment methods are limited and invasive.

Innovation Solution

Low-profile electrodes and restraining devices are attached to the left atrium to prevent thrombus formation and allow for low-energy recording, sensing, and pacing, and can be implanted to the left atrium to sense and map electrical impulses, and can be used to identify and treat AFIB in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If wires are placed in the left side of the heart for sensing and pacing, then sensing and pacing capabilities are improved, but the risk of thrombus detachment causing stroke increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensing capabilityVSAvoidstroke risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device is segmented into multiple components: a restraining device with anchors that secures the lead to the endocardium, preventing the wire from floating freely. This segmentation allows the lead to be firmly attached for sensing while minimizing thrombus formation risk by eliminating free-floating sections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The harmful floating section of the lead is extracted and replaced with a restrained configuration. The lead is taken out of the free-floating state and repositioned to be secured to the endocardial surface, removing the source of thrombus risk while preserving sensing functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If high energy is used for defibrillation, then defibrillation effectiveness is improved, but patient discomfort and battery wear increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefibrillation effectivenessVSAvoidbattery consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The defibrillation energy is concentrated locally at the left atrium where the arrhythmia originates, rather than delivering high energy throughout the entire heart. This localized approach achieves effective defibrillation with lower overall energy consumption, reducing battery wear and patient discomfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The device creates a localized electrical field copy of the defibrillation effect specifically at the left atrium, replicating the therapeutic effect of full-heart defibrillation but confined to the problematic region, thereby reducing total energy requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If traditional defibrillation is performed on the entire heart, then arrhythmia termination is achieved, but the procedure is invasive and requires EP lab setting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrhythmia terminationVSAvoidprocedure invasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex EP lab procedure is extracted and replaced by a simplified system where the implantable device with left atrial leads can detect and treat arrhythmias autonomously or with minimal external intervention, removing the need for invasive catheter-based procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The implanted device provides self-service by continuously monitoring left atrial electrical activity and automatically delivering defibrillation shocks when arrhythmias are detected, eliminating the need for external EP lab procedures and making the system self-sufficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables low-energy defibrillation, reduces patient discomfort, extends battery life, and allows for real-time AFIB detection and treatment outside the EP lab, improving cardiac output and preventing future AF events.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of electrical conductors disposed on endocardium of a heart wall within respective at least one chamber of a heart, an electrical signal characteristic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal sensing: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

Low-profile electrodes and restraining devices are attached to the left atrium to prevent thrombus formation and allow for low-energy recording

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical restraint: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS20260000335A1Implantable intracardiac atrial restraining device and system for sensing and identifying locations of changes to cardiac tissue that impact electrical signals therein
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 WOLF CARDIO LLC
  • US20260000335A1 patent drawing
  • US20260000335A1 patent drawing
  • US20260000335A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An implantable intracardiac atrial retraining device and system may be configured to sense and identify locations of changes to cardiac tissue that impact electrical signals therein. The implantable intracardiac atrial retraining device may include a septum electrode that crosses through the septum and multiple extension electrodes may extend therefrom along endocardium of one or both of the atria. The extension electrodes may be used to sense electrical electrodes produced by the sinoatrial node and one or more electrical characteristics of the heart tissue. If any changes to the electrical signals and/or electrical characteristics of the heart tissue change, a notification may be generated to notify a physician and/or patient.