Left Atrial Appendage Closure Implant With Passive Radial Fixation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical devices for closing the left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation fail to provide effective and secure closure without causing tissue damage, leading to potential thrombus formation and embolization.

Innovation Solution

A self-expandable occlusive medical implant with an expandable framework and occlusive element that exerts increasing radial force upon deployment, securing itself within the left atrial appendage without the need for piercing anchoring elements, and optionally includes a rotatable beam mechanism for enhanced securement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional closure devices are deployed to close the left atrial appendage, then closure is achieved, but tissue damage occurs and secure anchoring is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure effectivenessVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device divides the closure function into two independent parts: a self-expanding stent framework that provides structural support and anchoring without tissue penetration, and a separate occlusive element that seals the appendage opening. This segmentation allows each component to perform its function effectively while avoiding the need for piercing anchoring elements that cause tissue damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary occlusive element between the stent framework and the left atrial appendage tissue. This intermediary component seals the appendage without requiring the stent to directly penetrate or damage the tissue, thereby achieving effective closure while minimizing harmful effects on the tissue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If piercing anchoring elements are used to secure the device, then secure anchoring is achieved, but tissue damage and thrombus formation risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice anchoring securityVSAvoidthrombus formation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical piercing anchoring system with a self-expanding stent framework that achieves anchoring through radial expansion force. The stent expands to press against the appendage wall, creating secure anchoring without penetration, thereby eliminating the source of tissue damage and thrombus formation risk associated with piercing elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If a self-expanding stent is used without mechanical expansion capability, then device simplicity is maintained, but securement force is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structure simplicityVSAvoidradial securement force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic mechanical expansion capability to the stent framework, allowing it to transition from an expanded configuration to a securement configuration. This dynamic feature enables the stent to increase its radial force on demand while maintaining relative structural simplicity, as the expansion mechanism is integrated into the stent's own framework rather than requiring separate complex components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The implant provides secure closure of the left atrial appendage, reducing thrombus formation and embolization risks by exerting a strong radial force for anchoring, while minimizing tissue damage and allowing for reversible deployment.

Implementation Method 1

the expandable framework may exert a first radial force on the left atrial appendage in the expanded configuration and the expandable framework may exert a second radial force on the left atrial appendage in the securement configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadial force: Force

Data Source

PatentEP4465902B1Left atrial appendage closure device with passive fixation
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED INC
  • EP4465902B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4465902B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4465902B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An occlusive medical implant for implantation within a left atrial appendage may include an expandable framework configured to self-expand from a collapsed configuration to an expanded configuration, and an occlusive element disposed on a proximal portion of the expandable framework. At least a portion of the expandable framework may be mechanically expandable from the expanded configuration to a securement configuration. When the occlusive medical implant is disposed within the left atrial appendage, the expandable framework exerts a first radial force on the left atrial appendage in the expanded configuration and the expandable framework exerts a second radial force on the left atrial appendage in the securement configuration. The second radial force is greater than the first radial force.