Legal Analytics System for Automated Strategy Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current legal information systems primarily focus on the 'finding' task, leaving the 'analyzing' and 'deciding' tasks, such as formulating legal strategies, to be performed manually or semi-manually by attorneys, which is laborious and prone to bias.

Innovation Solution

The system employs data mining, natural language processing, and machine learning to analyze case facts, compare them with similar cases in a large legal database, and generate prospective legal strategies by identifying underlying patterns and providing insights for effective legal arguments and strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual or semi-manual analysis of legal cases is performed by attorneys, then legal strategies can be formulated with human judgment, but the process is laborious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of legal strategy formulationVSAvoidtime required for legal analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated legal analysis system that acts as an intermediary between case data and attorney decision-making. The system processes case facts, identifies patterns, and generates analytical insights that assist attorneys in formulating strategies, thereby reducing manual analysis time while maintaining quality through human oversight of the automated outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual analysis process with an automated computer-based system that uses data processing algorithms to analyze case facts, identify patterns, and generate strategic recommendations. This substitution dramatically reduces the time required for legal analysis while preserving the quality of strategic formulation through the system's ability to process and evaluate multiple case parameters simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual legal strategy formulation is performed, then human judgment and experience can be applied, but the process is prone to bias and inconsistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of legal strategyVSAvoidcomplexity of automated analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the human cognitive process with an automated system that applies consistent analytical rules and algorithms to all cases. This substitution eliminates human bias and inconsistency in legal strategy formulation, providing reliable and repeatable results across different cases and attorneys, while the system's structured approach manages complexity through standardized analysis frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative human judgment into quantifiable parameters that can be processed consistently by the automated system. By converting legal analysis into measurable factors and weighted criteria, the system achieves reliability and consistency in strategy formulation, reducing the impact of subjective bias while managing complexity through parameter-based evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If comprehensive case analysis is performed manually, then thorough examination of all case aspects is possible, but the labor and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of case information analysisVSAvoidspeed of legal analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual case analysis with an automated system that can process and evaluate all case information simultaneously. The system extracts, analyzes, and synthesizes comprehensive case data including facts, patterns, and relevant parameters much faster than manual review, maintaining complete information analysis while dramatically increasing productivity through automated data processing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the comprehensive case analysis into distinct processing components that can be handled efficiently by the automated system. By dividing the analysis into separate functional modules (data extraction, pattern recognition, parameter evaluation), the system achieves thorough examination of all case aspects while maintaining high processing speed and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3417409B1Scenario analytics system
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 THOMSON REUTERS ENTERPRISE CENTRE GMBH
  • EP3417409B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3417409B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3417409B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems, technologies and techniques for generating prospective legal strategies are disclosed. The system and technologies employ data mining, natural language processing and machine learning approaches to generate prospective legal strategies. The system and technologies analyze given case facts (i.e., background facts, event type such as accident, injury, malpractice, discrimination) and provide a rich set of insights that assist in formulating effective legal arguments and strategies.