Legal Billing Pattern Matching for Block Billing Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current legal billing systems are unable to automatically detect block billing, leading to inflated fees for clients as lawyers aggregate multiple tasks into a single entry, making it difficult for clients to determine fair billing practices.

Innovation Solution

A special purpose computing apparatus and method that analyzes electronic legal bills using grammatical, textual, and graphical analyses to identify indicia of block billing, such as excessive use of 'and' tokens, punctuation, and image comparisons, to separate and notify of potentially block-billed entries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If block billing is used to aggregate multiple tasks into a single entry, then billing efficiency is improved, but measurement precision of actual time spent deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebilling efficiencyVSAvoidtime measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments block-billed entries by using natural language processing to identify conjunctions (such as 'and') that separate distinct tasks within a single billing entry. This segmentation allows the system to break down aggregated tasks into individual components for separate analysis, thereby maintaining billing efficiency while improving measurement precision of actual time spent on each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If block billing aggregates multiple tasks, then ease of operation in billing is improved, but detection difficulty of individual tasks worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebilling operation simplicityVSAvoidtask detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis layer that processes billing entries by identifying linguistic patterns (conjunctions, punctuation, capitalization) that indicate separate tasks. This intermediary layer acts as a mediator between the aggregated block billing format and the need for individual task detection, enabling the system to maintain operational simplicity while improving task detection capability through pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If lawyers overestimate time spent on tasks, then productivity reporting is simplified, but loss of information regarding actual time spent increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime tracking complexityVSAvoidactual time information accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by analyzing the linguistic structure of billing entries to detect patterns that indicate multiple tasks. By providing feedback on the detected task structure, the system can identify when time estimates may be inaccurate due to aggregation, allowing for correction and more accurate tracking of actual time spent on each individual task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11049204B1Visual and text pattern matching
Publication Date: 2021.06.29 BOTTOMLINE TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11049204B1 patent drawing
  • US11049204B1 patent drawing
  • US11049204B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatically detecting block legal billing is described where the technique analyzes each billing entry in the legal bill for visual or textual aspects that indicate that a list of billing items is included in the block. The technique utilizes a combination of textual analysis for punctuation characters, count of the number of verbs, or a search for conjunctions. A visual analysis is match the image of the billing item with a predetermined image of a list. Essentially, a novel natural language processing technique is described that identifies lists in a block of text, where the block of text is in the context of a legal bill.