Digital Document Analysis System for Legal Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current legal document analysis systems require significant manual effort and are not equipped to analyze or summarize legal documents with the necessary accuracy and particularity, especially when dealing with complex documents or external considerations like jurisdiction and party representation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for digital document analysis that uses a server-based processor to classify documents, implement multiple classification protocols, and generate signal representations, identifying potential section classifications based on a training set, with the ability to override expert rules and compare outputs for accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If template-based systems are used for legal document analysis, then document drafting can be standardized and firm-specific standards can be maintained, but the systems require constant manual maintenance by lawyers and do not reflect market developments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirm standard consistencyVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-updating by connecting to external template databases and using machine learning algorithms to automatically incorporate market developments and updates without requiring manual intervention by lawyers, thus maintaining firm standards while eliminating constant maintenance requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-loads and caches template data from external databases before they are needed, and uses predictive algorithms to anticipate required updates, allowing the system to be ready for use without last-minute manual maintenance efforts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If online template databases are used, then access to broader template ranges is improved, but excessive time is required to search, review and customize templates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemplate varietyVSAvoidtemplate customization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical searching and reviewing of templates with automated electronic search algorithms and machine learning-based recommendation systems that instantly retrieve and rank relevant templates based on document requirements, eliminating time-consuming manual processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intelligent intermediary layer between the template database and the lawyer, using natural language processing and classification algorithms to automatically match document requirements with appropriate templates, eliminating the need for lawyers to manually search and review multiple templates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual document classification is performed, then document type and external considerations can be accurately determined, but the process is arduous and prone to mistakes and overlooked details

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual human classification with automated machine learning algorithms and natural language processing systems that analyze document content, structure, and context to accurately determine document types and external considerations without human intervention, thereby maintaining high accuracy while eliminating process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and uses trained models that replicate the classification expertise of experienced lawyers, allowing these learned patterns to be automatically applied to new documents without requiring the actual lawyers to perform the repetitive classification task, thus maintaining accuracy while simplifying the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Productivity

If automated classification tools are used, then document processing speed is improved, but the tools require substantial human customization and tailoring to be implemented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument processing speedVSAvoidimplementation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-customization by automatically adapting to firm-specific requirements and document types through machine learning, eliminating the need for lawyers to manually configure and tailor the tool, thus maintaining high processing speed while improving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to be dynamically adaptive, automatically adjusting its classification parameters and algorithms based on the specific characteristics of the documents being processed and the firm's requirements, allowing it to remain both fast and easy to use without manual customization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10891699B2System and method in support of digital document analysis
Publication Date: 2021.01.12 LEGALOGIC LTD
  • US10891699B2 patent drawing
  • US10891699B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods in support of digital document analysis receive a data file having a document containing text; determine a document classification for the document and at least one defined external consideration relating to the first document; section the first document into a plurality of sections; for each of the plurality of sections: implement a plurality of classification protocols; and generate one or more signal representations based on the document classification, the at least one defined external consideration, and the implemented plurality of classification protocols; identify one or more potential section classifications for one or more of the plurality of sections based on information relating to a training set of signal representations; determine a relative accuracy of the one or more potential section classifications for one or more of the plurality of sections; and output one or more recommended section classifications for one or more of the plurality of sections.