Legal Document Categorization Approval via Single Input Action

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The review and categorization of documents during litigation is a labor-intensive process, often involving the withholding of irrelevant or privileged documents, which complicates the production and approval of documents in legal proceedings.

Innovation Solution

A computer-readable storage medium with executable instructions that enables the display and acceptance of legal categorizations for documents with a single input action, allowing for streamlined review and categorization through a legal categorization pre-processor and approval module, facilitating the invocation of subsequent documents and revision of categorizations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review and categorization of documents is performed, then document accuracy and legal compliance are maintained, but the process becomes labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument categorization accuracyVSAvoidreview process duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated categorization of documents using AI/ML algorithms before human review. This pre-processing step assigns initial categorizations that reviewers can then verify or correct, significantly reducing the time required for manual review while maintaining accuracy through the single-action approval mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables reviewers to perform self-service by allowing them to approve categorizations with a single action without requiring complex multi-step verification processes. The automated system serves itself by providing pre-categorized documents that require minimal human intervention, thus reducing both time and labor intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple actions are required to approve document categorizations, then review accuracy is maintained through thorough verification, but the review process becomes more complex and slower

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecategorization review reliabilityVSAvoidreviewer operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the essential approval action from the complex multi-step verification process. By identifying and isolating the critical decision point (approval or rejection of categorization), the system allows reviewers to complete the review with a single action, thereby maintaining reliability while dramatically improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary verification and validation of categorizations before presenting them to reviewers. This pre-verification ensures that only high-confidence categorizations require reviewer attention, and those can be approved with a single action, thus maintaining reliability while simplifying the operational process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If comprehensive document review is conducted to ensure all legal criteria are met, then document production compliance is ensured, but the cost and time of litigation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument production complianceVSAvoidlitigation processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary compliance checking using automated algorithms that screen documents against legal criteria before human review. This pre-screening identifies documents that clearly meet or fail compliance requirements, allowing reviewers to focus only on borderline cases and thereby maintain compliance while improving overall processing efficiency and reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service compliance verification where the automated categorization and review system handles routine compliance checks without requiring extensive manual verification. This self-verification capability ensures compliance is maintained while significantly improving productivity and reducing litigation costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9460164B2Apparatus and method for single action approval of legally categorized documents
Publication Date: 2016.10.04 OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
  • US9460164B2 patent drawing
  • US9460164B2 patent drawing
  • US9460164B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer readable storage medium includes executable instructions to display a document with legal categorizations. The legal categorizations are accepted and invoke a subsequent document for viewing with a single input action. The subsequent document is displayed. Revised legal categorizations are received. The revised legal categorizations are accepted and invoke an additional document for viewing with a single input action.