Legal Framework File System Automating Privacy Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in enforcing compliance with various data privacy legal frameworks, such as GDPR, HIPPA, and PIPEDA, as they require manual and often disparate approaches for handling consent, data storage, access, and breach reporting, placing a burden on security and privacy experts.

Innovation Solution

A built-in Legal Framework File System (LFFS) that integrates with the operating system to enforce consent-based access policies, using metadata to manage and enforce privacy controls, ensuring compliance with data privacy laws by automating access, storage, and data handling processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual and disparate approaches are used for handling consent, data storage, access, and breach reporting, then flexibility in implementing privacy frameworks is maintained, but the burden on security and privacy experts increases and compliance efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of compliance enforcementVSAvoidcomplexity of privacy management
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges consent management, data storage, access control, and breach reporting into a single integrated Legal Framework File System. The filesystem automatically enforces multiple privacy frameworks (GDPR, HIPAA, PIPEDA) through unified metadata structures and access policies, eliminating the need for separate manual processes and reducing the burden on security experts while maintaining comprehensive compliance coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If automated access control policies are enforced through metadata, then compliance accuracy with privacy laws is improved, but system complexity and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of compliance enforcementVSAvoidcomplexity of filesystem infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by embedding consent-based access policies and privacy metadata into files at the time of creation or import. The Legal Framework File System pre-configures access control rules based on the applicable privacy framework, so that compliance enforcement is automatically applied without requiring complex real-time decision-making or additional system overhead during data access operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal metadata structure that serves multiple functions simultaneously: storing consent information, defining access policies, tracking data lineage, and enabling breach detection. This multi-functional metadata approach allows the system to achieve high compliance accuracy without proportionally increasing system complexity, as the same metadata infrastructure supports multiple compliance requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11328089B2Built-in legal framework file management
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 MERATIVE US LP
  • US11328089B2 patent drawing
  • US11328089B2 patent drawing
  • US11328089B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach is disclosed that enforces a privacy legal framework filesystem along with an operating system (OS) to enforce the privacy legal framework. An access of a datum in a selected file in the filesystem includes accessing a metadata associated with the selected file where the metadata includes a privacy state and an owner consent-based access policy. The owner consent-based access policy is enforced by the OS via special-purpose support requiring usage of the metadata to access the selected file.