Electronic System for Tracking Legal Text Modifications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies do not provide an efficient system for studying and updating legal texts and codes of regulation, which often require reprinting entire textbooks or codes due to modifications, posing challenges for law students and professionals.

Innovation Solution

An electronic system with a touch-screen device connected to a server and database, allowing real-time updates and historical version tracking, using an electronic pen for annotations and comparisons, and enabling sharing and organization of study materials through multimedia folders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional paper textbooks or codes of regulation are used, then the content can be studied, but frequent modifications require reprinting entire textbooks, causing loss of time and resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveup-to-date legal contentVSAvoidtime for reprinting and updating
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements digital copying of legal texts in electronic format, allowing instant updates without physical reprinting. The system stores multiple versions of legal texts digitally, enabling users to access current and historical versions immediately when modifications occur, eliminating the time-consuming reprinting process while ensuring reliable access to up-to-date content

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares and stores multiple versions of legal texts in advance in the database. When a modification occurs, the updated version is already available in the system, allowing immediate access without waiting for physical reprinting and distribution. This preliminary preparation of content in digital form resolves the contradiction between maintaining reliability and avoiding time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If entire textbooks are reprinted for every modification, then content accuracy is maintained, but cost and resource consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent accuracyVSAvoidpaper and printing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical textbook copies with digital electronic copies stored in a database. Multiple versions of legal texts are maintained digitally, allowing instant updates without consuming paper and printing resources. Users access content through electronic devices, eliminating the need for physical reprinting while maintaining content accuracy through version control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical state of legal text storage from paper-based to digital-electronic form. This parameter change eliminates consumption of paper and printing resources while maintaining the ability to track and access different versions of legal texts, thereby preserving content accuracy without resource loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of substance

If digital eBooks are used, then paper consumption is reduced, but tracking modifications and historical versions becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepaper usageVSAvoidhistorical version tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the legal text system into multiple distinct versions, each stored separately in the database with unique identifiers. The interface allows users to view and compare different versions side by side or sequentially. This segmentation enables efficient tracking of modifications and historical versions while maintaining the environmental benefits of digital storage over paper

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that automatically notify users when modifications occur in legal texts. The interface provides information about version changes, allowing users to access and study historical versions. This feedback system ensures that digital users can track modifications effectively without requiring paper-based records

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If traditional study methods are used, then no special equipment is needed, but efficiency and accessibility of legal research decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelegal research efficiencyVSAvoidelectronic system requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal electronic system that can be accessed through common electronic devices such as tablets, smartphones, and computers. The system provides multiple functions including viewing current and historical versions, comparing texts, taking notes, and sharing content within a single integrated platform. This multi-functionality increases legal research efficiency while utilizing familiar devices, thereby limiting the perceived complexity for users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3610360B1Electronic system for amending and studying codes of regulation
Publication Date: 2022.06.01 EASYSTUDY SRL
  • EP3610360B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3610360B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Electronic system for amending and studying codes of regulation, provided with an electronic device (100) connected to the Internet (400) in order to receive amendments of texts from a server (300); said electronic device (100) being provided with a display (101) with a timeline (150) that highlights the text modification dates, labeling the successful reading or the failure to read with symbols and/or colors; said electronic device (100) provided with an electronic pen (200) in order to allow supplementing the text with highlights, remarks, notes, external links, images, etc.; said electronic pen (200) having the following buttons: "mode" (203), adapted to cause the reversible switching from a "highlighter" mode, to a "pen" mode, to an "eraser" mode; "timeline" (204) in order to compare the different versions of the laws;- "users" (205) in order to view and share comments on the legislative texts with other users "writing" (206) in order to modify the writing settings and adapt the space available for the user for the remarks; a tip (201) in order to write with precision on the law texts and loaded documents.