Legged Robot Slip Detection Through Foot Distance Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic systems face challenges in efficiently navigating rough or uneven terrain, particularly in maintaining balance and preventing slips of their feet, which can disrupt their gait and operation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation involves a legged robot using sensors to detect ground reaction forces, monitor foot distances, and adjust actuation and position to control these forces within a threshold friction cone, thereby preventing slips and correcting gait disturbances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the robot uses sensors to detect ground reaction forces and monitor foot distances to maintain balance on rough terrain, then the robot's stability and ability to prevent slips is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot employs sensors to continuously monitor ground reaction forces and foot distances, creating a feedback loop that allows the control system to detect slips and adjust actuation in real-time. This feedback mechanism enables the robot to maintain stability on rough terrain by comparing expected versus actual sensor data and making corrective adjustments to foot positioning and body posture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces purely mechanical balance-maintenance systems with a sensor-based detection and control system. Instead of relying solely on mechanical design features for stability, the system uses electronic sensors to detect ground reaction forces and foot positions, then uses control algorithms to adjust actuation, substituting mechanical passivity with active electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If the robot adjusts actuation and position to control ground reaction forces within a threshold friction cone, then the robot's ability to prevent slips is improved, but the ease of operation decreases due to complex real-time adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslip preventionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters including actuation commands, foot position, and body posture based on real-time sensor feedback. The control system adjusts these parameters to keep ground reaction forces within the friction cone, preventing slips. This involves continuous modification of multiple parameters coordinated through the control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The robot performs preliminary adjustments to foot position and actuation before slips occur by continuously monitoring sensor data and predicting potential loss of traction. The system proactively modifies gait patterns and foot placement to prevent slip conditions rather than reacting after slips occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the robot monitors foot distances and compares differences to threshold values to detect slips, then the measurement precision of slip detection is improved, but the loss of time increases due to continuous monitoring and comparison operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslip detection precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses threshold-based comparison to quickly identify slip conditions without performing complex analysis on every sensor reading. When sensor data exceeds predefined thresholds indicating potential slips, the system immediately triggers corrective action, skipping detailed analysis for normal conditions and focusing computational resources only on anomaly detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS20260035043A1Detecting and Responding to A Difference Between Parameters of a Legged Robot
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 BOSTON DYNAMICS INC
  • US20260035043A1 patent drawing
  • US20260035043A1 patent drawing
  • US20260035043A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example method may include i) determining a first distance between a pair of feet of a robot at a first time, where the pair of feet is in contact with a ground surface; ii) determining a second distance between the pair of feet of the robot at a second time, where the pair of feet remains in contact with the ground surface from the first time to the second time; iii) comparing a difference between the determined first and second distances to a threshold difference; iv) determining that the difference between determined first and second distances exceeds the threshold difference; and v) based on the determination that the difference between the determined first and second distances exceeds the threshold difference, causing the robot to react.