Lens Driving Device Radial Urging Member

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lens driving devices face inefficiencies in transmitting driving force from the actuator to the lens holder due to the placement of urging members on the driving force transmission path, leading to losses and vibrations that hinder proper force transmission.

Innovation Solution

The lens driving device positions the urging member to apply an urging force that rotates the lens holder towards the actuator, keeping a favorable contact state while keeping the urging member away from the driving force transmission path, ensuring efficient force transmission. This configuration includes a spring, arm member, substrate, and ball member to apply the urging force effectively without interfering with the actuator's force transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the urging member is arranged between the lens holder and the actuator, then the lens holder and actuator can maintain contact, but the urging member is located on the driving force transmission path causing loss in force transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact state between lens holder and actuatorVSAvoidloss in driving force transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The urging member is repositioned from the optical axis direction (between lens holder and actuator) to the radial direction (at the corner of the lens holder). This spatial reconfiguration removes the urging member from the driving force transmission path while maintaining the necessary contact force between the actuator and lens holder through a different geometric arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the urging member is arranged between the actuator and the securing part, then contact is maintained, but the urging member is substantially located on the driving force transmission path causing actuator vibration and force transmission loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact state between lens holder and actuatorVSAvoidactuator vibration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The urging member is relocated from the optical axis direction (where it would cause actuator vibration) to the radial direction at the corner of the lens holder. This dimensional shift allows the urging member to apply contact force without interfering with the actuator's driving force transmission path, thereby eliminating actuator vibration while maintaining reliable contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of energy

If the urging member is positioned away from the driving force transmission path, then force transmission efficiency is improved, but the contact state between lens holder and actuator may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss in driving force transmissionVSAvoidcontact state between lens holder and actuator
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The urging member is positioned asymmetrically at the corner of the lens holder rather than symmetrically on the optical axis. This asymmetric placement allows the urging member to apply radial contact force that maintains the contact state between the actuator and lens holder while being completely separated from the axial driving force transmission path, thus resolving the contradiction between force transmission efficiency and contact reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables efficient transmission of the driving force from the actuator to the lens holder, reducing friction and power consumption, and allowing for a larger lens holder size within a compact device, thus enabling the mounting of larger diameter lenses.

Implementation Method 1

The urging member comprises a spring, an arm member having one end in contact with the spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the ball member in contact with the substrate and lens holder is rotatable, frictions occurring between the ball member and the substrate and lens holder are very small

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8675294B2Lens driving device
Publication Date: 2014.03.18 ACTUTEK CORP
  • US8675294B2 patent drawing
  • US8675294B2 patent drawing
  • US8675294B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lens driving device comprises a lens holder for holding a lens, a shaft for supporting the lens holder so as to make the lens holder movable in an optical axis direction of the lens and swingable about an axis of the shaft, an actuator for applying a driving force to the lens holder so as to move the lens holder in the optical axis direction; and an urging member for applying an urging force to the lens holder so as to rotate the lens holder toward the actuator. In the lens holder, a position where the urging force is applied by the urging member and a position where the driving force is applied by the actuator oppose each other, so that the urging force from the urging member is directed to the actuator.