Lens Holder Driving Device with Suspension Wire Fracture Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lens holder driving devices for miniature cameras face challenges in stabilizing images without increasing size or complexity, particularly in miniaturizing image stabilizers that can effectively counter camera shake while maintaining impact resistance and preventing suspension wire fractures.

Innovation Solution

A lens holder driving device with an auto-focusing lens holder driving portion and an image stabilizer portion that uses suspension wires to swingably support the lens holder in orthogonal directions, incorporating a fracture preventing member to avoid wire fractures and enhance impact resistance, while optimizing the placement of permanent magnets and coils for improved sensitivity and assembly efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If suspension wires are used to swingably support the lens holder for image stabilization, then image stabilization is achieved, but the suspension wires may fracture under impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidwire fracture resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a buffer member that absorbs impact energy before it reaches the suspension wires. This cushioning element is positioned to receive impacts in the optical axis direction and prevent the transmission of excessive forces that would cause wire fracture, thereby protecting the image stabilization mechanism while maintaining its functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Volume of moving object

If the image stabilizer is miniaturized for mobile terminals, then device size is reduced, but sensitivity of driving force decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage stabilizer sizeVSAvoiddriving force sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent strategically positions the permanent magnet and coil at specific locations within the miniaturized image stabilizer structure. The coil is disposed to face the permanent magnet with optimized spacing, creating a concentrated magnetic field interaction zone that maximizes driving force sensitivity despite the reduced overall size of the image stabilizer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes physical parameters such as the spacing between the coil and permanent magnet, the dimensions of these components, and the magnetic field strength to enhance driving force sensitivity. By carefully adjusting these parameters, the system achieves high sensitivity in a miniaturized configuration suitable for mobile terminals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If permanent magnets and coils are positioned for optimal sensitivity, then driving force sensitivity improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving force sensitivityVSAvoidmagnet and coil arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the permanent magnet and coil into a unified image stabilizer assembly where these components work together as a single functional unit. This merging of elements simplifies the overall structure by eliminating the need for separate mounting mechanisms and reduces the number of discrete parts, thereby decreasing device complexity while maintaining optimal sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively stabilizes images without increasing size, enhances impact resistance by preventing wire fractures, and improves sensitivity of the driving force for orthogonal movements, addressing the limitations of previous miniaturization efforts.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of suspension wires having first end portions fixed to the fixed portion and having second end portions fixed to the auto-focusing lens holder driving portion, and swingably supporting the auto-focusing lens holder driving portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a fracture preventing member preventing the plurality of suspension wires from fracturing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact Force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 3

optimizing the placement of permanent magnets and coils for improved sensitivity and assembly efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS9298017B2Lens driving device
Publication Date: 2016.03.29 MITSUMI ELECTRIC CO LTD
  • US9298017B2 patent drawing
  • US9298017B2 patent drawing
  • US9298017B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lens holder driving device includes an auto-focusing lens holder driving portion moving a lens holder holding a lens barrel along an optical axis, and an image stabilizer portion stabilizing image blurred by moving the auto-focusing lens holder driving portion in first and second directions which are orthogonal to the optical axis and which are perpendicular to each other. The image stabilizer portion includes: a fixed portion disposed apart from the auto-focusing lens holder driving portion in the direction of the optical axis; a plurality of suspension wires having first end portions fixed to the fixed portion at outer regions thereof, extending along the optical axis, having second end portions fixed to the auto-focusing lens holder driving portion, and swingably supporting the auto-focusing lens holder driving portion in the first direction and the second direction; and a fracture preventing member preventing the suspension wires from fracturing.