Lens Driving Magnet Layout for Precise AF Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lens driving devices face challenges in achieving precise auto-focusing (AF) driving due to interference between the magnet for driving and the magnet for sensing, which affects the position sensor output, particularly in miniaturized and low-power consuming camera modules used in smartphones and similar devices.

Innovation Solution

A lens driving device design that includes a bobbin with a first coil and magnets, where the second magnet is positioned to minimize interference by having a shorter length along the optical axis and increasing width in other directions, allowing for precise AF driving by optimizing the magnetic field sensing range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the second magnet is positioned closer to the first coil to enhance sensing capability, then the position sensor output range is improved, but interference between the driving magnet and sensing magnet increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition sensor output rangeVSAvoidmagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by making the second magnet shorter in the optical axis direction (vertical dimension) and wider in the radial direction (horizontal dimension). This dimensional transformation allows the magnet to maintain sufficient sensing capability in the radial direction while reducing magnetic interference in the optical axis direction where the driving magnet is located.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The second magnet is designed with non-uniform dimensions, being shorter in the optical axis direction and wider in the radial direction. This local quality differentiation optimizes the magnetic field distribution, providing strong sensing output in the radial direction while minimizing interference in the optical axis direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Volume of moving object

If the camera module is miniaturized to reduce device size, then the overall device dimensions are improved, but the separation distance between driving and sensing magnets decreases, increasing interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera module sizeVSAvoidmagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the miniaturization interference problem by changing the dimensional characteristics of the second magnet. By making it shorter in the optical axis direction and wider radially, the design achieves compact overall size while maintaining adequate magnetic field separation and sensing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the second magnet, specifically reducing its length in the optical axis direction and increasing its width in the radial direction. This parameter optimization allows the camera module to be miniaturized while maintaining sufficient separation between magnetic components to reduce interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If the second magnet is made longer in the optical axis direction to increase magnetic field strength, then the sensing capability is improved, but the interference with the driving magnet increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic field strengthVSAvoidmagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The second magnet is designed with differentiated local dimensions, being shorter in the optical axis direction where interference occurs and wider in the radial direction where sensing is needed. This local quality optimization maintains sufficient magnetic field strength for sensing while minimizing interference with the driving magnet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the magnetic field generation approach by orienting the second magnet's extended dimension radially rather than axially. This dimensional change allows the magnet to produce strong radial magnetic fields for sensing while reducing axial magnetic field strength that would interfere with the driving magnet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively suppresses interference between the driving and sensing magnets, enhancing the range of the position sensor output and enabling precise AF driving, even in compact camera modules.

Implementation Method 1

a first position sensor disposed on the housing and configured to sense strength of a magnetic field of the second magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field sensing: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

a first coil disposed on an outer circumference surface of the bobbin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11835787B2Lens driving device, and camera module and optical device including same
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 LG INNOTEK CO LTD
  • US11835787B2 patent drawing
  • US11835787B2 patent drawing
  • US11835787B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment comprises: a housing; a bobbin, which is arranged inside the housing and is for mounting a lens; first coils arranged around the outer peripheral surface of the bobbin; a first magnet arranged in the housing; a second magnet arranged at the bobbin and spaced from the first coils; and a first position sensor arranged in the housing and sensing the intensity of a magnetic field of the second magnet, wherein the length of the second magnet in the direction of an optical axis is shorter than the length of thereof in the direction perpendicular to the direction of the optical axis.