Low-stress lens mount assembly for UV optics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lens carriers for high-power UV and DUV objectives face challenges in maintaining low-stress retention of optical elements, as they often result in misalignment and deformation due to dynamic and thermal loads, and require precise manufacturing tolerances and frictional engagement, which can impair imaging quality.

Innovation Solution

A mount assembly with a monolithic mount ring featuring retaining arms of unequal lengths, where three arms with a first length contact the end face for axial holding and additional arms with a second length contact the circumferential surface for radial holding, utilizing adhesive bonding and radial elasticity to minimize stress and misalignment, while allowing thermal expansion without radial tensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If frictional engagement is used to hold the lens in the mount, then the lens position is determined, but imaging quality is impaired due to deformation and misalignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelens position determinationVSAvoidimaging quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the friction-based mechanical holding system with an adhesive bonding system. The adhesive layer bonds the lens to the mount ring, eliminating frictional forces that cause deformation and misalignment while maintaining precise lens positioning. This substitution of mechanical friction with chemical bonding resolves the contradiction between position determination and imaging quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the lens is pressed against the retaining projection, then axial position is fixed, but lens deformation occurs on the optically active surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial position stabilityVSAvoidlens deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the pressing function from the optically active surface of the lens. Instead of pressing the lens at its active surface, the adhesive bonding system distributes holding forces across the lens periphery and mount structure, eliminating localized deformation at the optically critical surface while maintaining axial position stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesive layer acts as a flexible bonding film that distributes mechanical stresses uniformly across the lens-mount interface. This flexible bonding mechanism provides axial position stability without concentrating forces that would deform the lens, particularly avoiding pressure on the optically active surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Adaptability or versatility

If radial clearance fit is used to allow thermal expansion, then thermal expansion is accommodated, but misalignment occurs under dynamic loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal expansion accommodationVSAvoidlens alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of thermal expansion accommodation and dynamic load stabilization into a single adhesive bonding system. The adhesive layer provides both the compliance needed for thermal expansion and the bonding strength to prevent misalignment under dynamic loads, eliminating the need for separate clearance fit mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesive bonding system creates a composite structure between the lens and mount ring that combines the properties of both materials with the bonding interface. This composite connection allows differential thermal expansion while maintaining structural integrity and alignment stability under dynamic conditions, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Force

If spring forces are used to hold the lens, then axial retention is achieved, but stress states in the lens change with thermal expansion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial retention forceVSAvoidlens stress state
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the spring-based mechanical retention system with an adhesive bonding system. The adhesive provides continuous axial retention force without the cyclic loading and stress concentration inherent in spring mechanisms. This eliminates the problematic stress states that arise when spring forces interact with thermally expanding lens materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces the need for precise manufacturing tolerances and eliminates radial retaining forces on the lens, maintaining low-stress retention and improving imaging quality by compensating for thermal expansion and dynamic loads through adaptive elasticity, thereby enhancing the stability and accuracy of the lens positioning.

Implementation Method 1

at least two of the retaining arms are bonded to the element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

In order also to enable a radial thermal expansion of the lens without radial tensions occurring in the lens which can lead to dramatic impairments in optical imaging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

the free ends contact the element... utilizing adhesive bonding and radial elasticity to minimize stress and misalignment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadial elasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 4

dynamic loads can be damped

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDynamic load damping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS9964730B2Low-stress mount assembly
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 JENOPTIK OPTICAL SYSTEMS GMBH
  • US9964730B2 patent drawing
  • US9964730B2 patent drawing
  • US9964730B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Mount assembly with a monolithic mount formed by a mount ring with a plurality of retaining arms with free ends and an element, which retaining arms are arranged concentrically around the axis of symmetry of the mount ring and extend at least partially in axial direction. Three of the retaining arms contact an end face formed at the element and hold the element axially, while the other retaining arms are bonded to a circumferential surface formed at the element and prevent the element in particular from rotating.