Lens-Sensor Parallelism Judgment via Mark Coordinate Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing resolution of image pickup devices makes it difficult to accurately determine whether the lens and sensing element are parallel, as conventional methods rely on resolution values which are often indistinguishable regardless of alignment, impairing judgment accuracy.

Innovation Solution

An optical analysis method involving a standard image pickup device and an object with marks, where a standard image frame and a tested image frame are compared to assess parallelism by calculating error values between mark coordinates and areas, using a look-up table to determine tilt angles if necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional resolution-based methods are used to judge parallelism, then the method is simple to implement, but the judgment accuracy deteriorates with high-resolution lenses as resolution values become indistinguishable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of judgment methodVSAvoidaccuracy of parallelism judgment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the measurement parameter from resolution values (MTF) to geometric parameters (coordinates and areas of marks). This parameter transformation allows accurate parallelism judgment for high-resolution lenses by measuring the positions and sizes of known marks rather than relying on resolution contrasts that become indistinguishable at high resolutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces marks as intermediary objects placed on the object to be measured. These marks serve as reference points that mediate between the imaging system and the parallelism measurement, enabling precise geometric analysis through coordinate and area measurements of the marks in the captured image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If resolution values are used to determine parallelism, then the method requires minimal additional equipment, but the reliability of judgment decreases when lens resolution is significantly enhanced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of measurement systemVSAvoidreliability of parallelism judgment
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement parameter is changed from resolution-based MTF values to geometric parameters (coordinates and areas) of marks. This transformation maintains system simplicity while dramatically improving reliability for high-resolution lenses, as geometric measurements remain distinguishable even when resolution contrasts become indistinguishable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses marks that create a known geometric pattern copy in the image plane. By capturing and analyzing the positions and areas of these mark images, the system reliably determines parallelism through geometric relationships rather than resolution-based measurements, enhancing reliability without significantly increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If mark coordinates and areas are measured to assess parallelism, then the judgment accuracy improves for high-resolution devices, but the measurement and calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of parallelism judgmentVSAvoidcomplexity of measurement and calculation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the measurement task into distinct components: detecting mark positions (coordinates), measuring mark sizes (areas), and calculating parallelism from these parameters. This segmentation organizes the complexity into manageable steps, improving measurement precision while making the overall process systematically tractable despite increased complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-defining the mark patterns and their expected geometric relationships. The marks are designed with known coordinates and areas, allowing the system to directly compare measured values against predetermined standards, thereby improving accuracy while reducing the need for complex real-time calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8736686B2Method for judging whether lens and sensing element of image pickup device are parallel
Publication Date: 2014.05.27 PRIMAX ELECTRONICS LTD
  • US8736686B2 patent drawing
  • US8736686B2 patent drawing
  • US8736686B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical analysis method is provided for judging whether a lens and a sensing element of an image pickup device are parallel with each other. The method utilizes a tested image pickup device and a standard image pickup device to shoot an object at the same fixed shooting position to acquire a standard image frame and a tested image frame. According to the difference between the position coordinate value or the area of at least one mark of the standard image frame and the tested image frame, the method can judge whether the tested lens and the tested sensing element of the tested image pickup device are parallel with each other.