Iterative Probe Function Estimation for Lensless X-ray Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional imaging techniques face challenges such as resolution limits, aberrations, and the need for complex equipment, particularly when using short wavelength radiation like X-rays or electrons, and require accurate knowledge of the probe function, which can be time-consuming and prone to inaccuracies.

Innovation Solution

An iterative method where the probe function is iteratively calculated step-by-step, allowing for efficient image data collection without prior knowledge of the probe function, using an optical setup to measure illumination both before and after analyzing the target object, and updating both the object and probe functions concurrently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional transmission imaging with plane wave illumination and lens is used, then image formation is achieved, but resolution is limited by lens aberrations and instabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidlens stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the lens from the imaging system entirely, extracting the problematic optical element that causes aberrations and instabilities. The imaging function is achieved through computational methods (iterative algorithms) rather than traditional optical focusing, eliminating the source of resolution degradation while maintaining image formation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/optical lens-based imaging system with a computational approach. Instead of using physical lenses to focus and form images, the system uses iterative mathematical algorithms to reconstruct images from diffraction pattern measurements, substituting mechanical optical components with computational processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If accurate probe function measurement is performed before imaging, then image accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage accuracyVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary measurement of the probe function (illumination profile) before the main imaging process. By characterizing the illumination conditions in advance, the system can use this information in iterative algorithms to improve image reconstruction accuracy without requiring time-consuming adjustments during the actual imaging process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs iterative algorithms that use feedback from measured diffraction patterns to progressively refine the image reconstruction. The system continuously compares calculated diffraction patterns with actual measurements and adjusts the reconstructed image accordingly, improving accuracy through iterative feedback rather than requiring perfect initial probe function knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If iterative process with probe function calculation is used, then image data accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage data accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses partial information about the probe function (such as its intensity profile or support region) rather than requiring complete and precise knowledge. The iterative algorithms can converge to accurate solutions even with incomplete or approximate initial probe function information, performing partial measurements that are sufficient for high-quality reconstruction without excessive processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables high-resolution image data collection efficiently, reducing the need for precise probe function measurement and overcoming resolution limitations, while providing accurate image data characteristics of the target object.

Implementation Method 1

detecting the intensity of radiation scattered by the target object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

Each diffraction pattern is formed by illuminating an object with a known wave front of coherent radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 3

The exit wave function is propagated across distance D where a diffraction pattern is formed on an array of detectors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWave propagation:

Data Source

PatentEP2356487B1Provision of image data
Publication Date: 2018.04.04 PHASE FOCUS
  • EP2356487B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2356487B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2356487B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A method and apparatus are disclosed for providing image data. The method includes the steps of providing image data for constructing an image of a region of a target object, comprising the steps of: providing incident radiation from a radiation source at a target object and, via at least one detector, detecting an intensity of radiation scattered by the target object; estimating an object function indicating at least one characteristic of a region of the target object; estimating a probe function indicating at least one characteristic of the incident radiation; providing image data via an iterative process responsive to the detected intensity of radiation scattered by the target object, wherein in said iterative process each of the object function and probe function are iteratively re-estimated step by step with a running estimate of the probe function being utilised to determine a running estimate of the object function associated with the target object.