Automated Lesson Learned Tracking via Rating Matrix

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for tracking and monitoring lessons learned in project development are inefficient and time-consuming, as they require manual logging and prioritization, making it cumbersome to capture and implement valuable insights across multiple organizations and releases.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and apparatus that uses a client application to automatically capture, prioritize, and track lessons learned through a predefined level matrix and workflow notification process, allowing for timely documentation and implementation of lessons throughout the project duration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual logging and prioritization of lessons learned is performed, then flexibility in capturing lessons is maintained, but time consumption and inefficiency increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in capturing lessonsVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing project team members to automatically log lessons learned directly during project execution without requiring manual intervention from project managers or stakeholders. The automated workflow captures, prioritizes, and tracks lessons throughout the project lifecycle, eliminating time-consuming manual processes while maintaining user flexibility in how lessons are captured.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically capturing and prioritizing lessons learned as they occur during project execution, rather than waiting for manual documentation at project closure. The predefined level matrix and automated workflows prepare lesson data for implementation before it is needed, enabling timely application of lessons across future releases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual tracking and monitoring of lessons learned is performed, then customization of tracking processes is possible, but productivity decreases due to cumbersome manual processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization of tracking processesVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides dynamic tracking by allowing flexible configuration of lesson learned categories, priorities, and workflows that can be adapted to different project types and organizational requirements. The automated monitoring system dynamically adjusts tracking based on predefined criteria while maintaining high productivity through automation of status updates and progress monitoring across multiple releases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of information

If lessons learned are documented at the end of a release, then comprehensive documentation is achieved, but the value and applicability of lessons are reduced due to delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of documentationVSAvoidtime delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary documentation by capturing and recording lessons learned continuously throughout project execution rather than waiting for release completion. This ensures that lessons are documented while still relevant and immediately applicable to future releases, eliminating time delays while maintaining comprehensive documentation through automated continuous capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous documentation by maintaining an ongoing process of capturing, prioritizing, and tracking lessons learned throughout the entire project lifecycle. The automated workflow ensures continuous availability of lesson data without interruption, allowing comprehensive documentation to be achieved in real-time rather than at project closure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Reliability

If manual prioritization of lessons learned is performed, then strategic focus on high-value lessons is achieved, but resource allocation becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus on high-value lessonsVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies parameter changes by using a predefined level matrix that automatically assigns priority levels to lessons learned based on configurable criteria such as business impact, complexity, and implementation effort. This automated parameter-based prioritization ensures consistent focus on high-value lessons while improving resource allocation efficiency by eliminating subjective manual prioritization and enabling data-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7730005B2Issue tracking system using a criteria rating matrix and workflow notification
Publication Date: 2010.06.01 X CORP
  • US7730005B2 patent drawing
  • US7730005B2 patent drawing
  • US7730005B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method, apparatus, and computer program product for managing a lesson learned through a client application. A lesson learned is information describing a task associated with a project. A rating value for the lesson learned is identified using a predefined level matrix. A workflow notification process is generated to address the lesson learned using a notification manager. The lesson learned is monitored throughout the duration of a project.