Level Set Tree Feature Detection for Image Data Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image analysis techniques in military surveillance generate vast amounts of data, with only 20 to 30 percent being analyzed for changes, due to the lack of sufficient analysts to monitor all images, necessitating an automated tool to reduce data sets to relevant features and motion detection.

Innovation Solution

A parameter-free technique using the Helmholtz principle for statistical analysis to decompose images, identifying meaningful changes by categorizing pixels as 'noise' or 'not noise' through a level set tree feature detection method, which generates a binary map and determines maximal meaningful nodes, reducing data to significant changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated analysis tools are implemented to reduce data sets to relevant features, then productivity and analysis efficiency are improved, but device complexity and algorithm complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis efficiencyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image analysis process into distinct hierarchical levels using level set trees. Images are decomposed into multiple levels of detail, with each level representing different scales of features. This segmentation allows the system to process and analyze only relevant portions at each level, improving productivity while managing complexity through structured organization of the analysis pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to traditional image analysis by creating level set trees that organize features across multiple scales. This dimensional transformation from flat image processing to hierarchical tree structures enables more efficient navigation and analysis of relevant features, enhancing productivity without proportionally increasing algorithmic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If only 20 to 30 percent of image data is analyzed manually, then loss of time for full data processing is reduced, but loss of information increases due to unanalyzed data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidunanalyzed data
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating between meaningful and non-meaningful changes in different regions of images. The system identifies and focuses analysis on areas with significant changes while treating stable regions differently. This selective analysis approach reduces processing time for obvious cases while maintaining information completeness by systematically evaluating all regions through the level set hierarchy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by analyzing only the portions of images that contain meaningful changes rather than processing entire images uniformly. The level set tree structure enables the system to identify and focus computational resources on relevant features and changes, reducing overall processing time while ensuring that all potentially important information is captured through the hierarchical examination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If parameter-free techniques are used for feature detection, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision and detection accuracy may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the level set tree algorithm to automatically adapt to different image types and analysis requirements without manual parameter tuning. The system uses intrinsic image properties and statistical measures to guide the analysis process, making it easy to operate while maintaining precision through data-driven decision making rather than fixed parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts analysis parameters based on the specific characteristics of each image and analysis context rather than using fixed parameters. The level set tree structure allows the system to modify detection thresholds, resolution levels, and analysis depth according to the actual data being processed, maintaining high detection accuracy while keeping the system easy to operate through automatic adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8509546B1Level set tree feature detection
Publication Date: 2013.08.13 U S A AS REPRESENTED BY THE DEPT OF THE NAVY
  • US8509546B1 patent drawing
  • US8509546B1 patent drawing
  • US8509546B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A level set tree feature detection machine is disclosed along with a method for detecting a level set tree feature. At least one pixilated image is provided. An electronic model is generated of the pixilated images. Maximal meaningful nodes for the pixilated images are determined.