Level 3 Autonomous Driving Activation via Level 2 State Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional autonomous driving systems face usability issues when the activation conditions for level 3 autonomous driving are not satisfied, making it difficult for users to understand the cause and resulting in poor usability.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous driving control apparatus and method that uses level 2 autonomous driving functions to satisfy the activation conditions for level 3 by controlling vehicle speed and lane alignment, and includes a processor to determine and adjust these conditions, as well as an output device to inform the user of adjustments made.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system strictly requires activation conditions to be satisfied before enabling autonomous driving function, then system safety and reliability are improved, but user convenience and ease of operation deteriorate when conditions cannot be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically adjusting vehicle speed and lane alignment using level 2 autonomous driving functions before attempting to activate the level 3 autonomous driving function. This preliminary adjustment ensures that when the user requests level 3 activation, the system proactively creates the necessary conditions (satisfying activation criteria) rather than simply rejecting the request, thereby maintaining both reliability through condition verification and user convenience through automatic preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If the system provides detailed information about condition satisfaction status, then user understanding and information completeness are improved, but system complexity and information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by providing real-time information to the user about the satisfaction status of activation conditions through the output device. This feedback mechanism informs users whether conditions for level 3 autonomous driving are met or what adjustments are being made, ensuring information completeness without requiring complex additional subsystems, as the feedback leverages existing processing and communication infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the activation conditions into distinct evaluable criteria (vehicle speed condition, in-lane alignment condition) and provides information about each separately. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by breaking down the overall activation process into manageable, independently assessable components, making it easier to track and communicate status without overwhelming system or user complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the system automatically adjusts vehicle state to satisfy activation conditions, then autonomous driving activation success rate is improved, but control system complexity and adjustment coordination requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivation success rateVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies universality by using the level 2 autonomous driving functions (smart cruise control for speed adjustment, lane following assist for alignment adjustment) to satisfy the activation conditions for level 3. Instead of designing separate dedicated adjustment mechanisms, the system leverages the existing multi-functional autonomous driving capabilities already present in the vehicle, thereby improving activation success rate without significantly increasing control system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11801873B2Apparatus for controlling autonomous driving of a vehicle and method thereof
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11801873B2 patent drawing
  • US11801873B2 patent drawing
  • US11801873B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous driving control apparatus for a vehicle includes: a processor to determine activation of an autonomous driving function depending on whether a current driving situation satisfies an activation condition of the autonomous driving function during autonomous driving control; and a storage configured to store a set of instructions and data for determination and performance by the processor. In particular, the processor controls a vehicle to satisfy the activation condition and then determines activation of the autonomous driving function when the activation condition is not satisfied and a request to activate the autonomous driving function is inputted from a user.