Lever Mechanism Safety Device for Sudden Door Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety devices for preventing sudden door closures are complex, bulky, and inefficient, often only slowing down the closing process rather than fully stopping it, and require significant space for installation, posing risks to safety and structure integrity, especially with heavy doors like fire or armor-plated doors.

Innovation Solution

A safety device utilizing a lever mechanism with two articulated levers and elastic members of different elastic constants, where a clamping member engages to stop the door only when an impulsive force exceeding a certain threshold is applied, allowing gentle closure otherwise, and is designed to occupy minimal space when the door is closed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If axial sliding mechanism with springs is used to prevent sudden door closing, then safety function is achieved, but device becomes bulky and requires significant installation space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety functionVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The safety device is divided into two independent levers (first lever and second lever) that can be activated separately. The first lever handles normal closing operations while the second lever engages only during sudden closing events, allowing the device to remain compact while maintaining safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device uses dynamic activation of different levers based on the closing conditions. During normal closing, only the first lever is active. When sudden closing is detected through excessive force, the second lever dynamically engages to block the door, providing adaptive response without requiring constant bulky blocking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If complex mechanical safety mechanisms are used, then door closing control is achieved, but device complexity increases with large number of components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor closing controlVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control function is segmented between two levers with distinct roles. The first lever manages normal operation with simple spring-based return, while the second lever provides emergency blocking. This segmentation allows each component to be simple while the combination achieves complex control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second lever acts as an intermediary blocking element that is activated only when necessary. It mediates between the door's closing force and the frame, providing a simple binary state (blocked or not blocked) that adds safety functionality without requiring complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If safety device blocks door during closing, then sudden closing is prevented, but device must be bulky to ensure blocking capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblocking capabilityVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking capability is achieved dynamically through the second lever that engages only when sudden closing force is detected. The lever rotates from a retracted position to a blocking position, providing full blocking capability only when needed. This dynamic approach allows compact design while maintaining effective blocking when activated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The second lever is pre-positioned in a retracted state that does not interfere with normal door operation. When sudden closing occurs, the lever is rapidly rotated into the blocking position. This preliminary positioning allows the device to maintain compact size while being ready to provide full blocking capability when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively prevents sudden door closures by engaging a clamping mechanism only under high impulsive forces, ensuring safety and reliability while allowing normal closure, and is compact enough for easy installation on the fixed frame, reducing the risk of damage and injury.

Implementation Method 1

at least two elastic members, with a different elastic constant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

thrust toward an open position by a pair of helical springs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2761118B1Safety device to prevent the sudden closing of a movable element
Publication Date: 2017.01.18 OTLAV
  • EP2761118B1 patent drawing
  • EP2761118B1 patent drawing
  • EP2761118B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Safety device (10, 1 10, 210) to prevent the sudden closing of a movable element, such as a closing element of a piece of furniture or a door, comprising a lever mechanism (20, 120, 220) which in turn comprises an actuation lever (11, 11 1, 211), which can rotate with respect to a pin (12, 112, 215) between an open position and a clamping position, or alternatively, a closed position. A first elastic member (25, 125, 225) able to apply a first elastic force (R1) and a second elastic member (30, 130, 230) able to apply a second elastic force (R2), less than the first elastic force (R1), act on the mechanism lever (20, 120, 220).