Levitated Chess Board Using Magnetic Repulsion for Automated Piece Movement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing intelligent chess boards lack real interactivity as piece movement still requires manual operation, and existing technologies like magnetic movement or mechanical arms are either limited in movement or aesthetically unpleasing and risky.

Innovation Solution

A levitated chess system where pieces can levitate relative to the board, utilizing a piece driving base with electromagnetic coils to generate repulsive magnetic forces, allowing pieces to move intelligently and jump over other pieces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If magnetic moving pieces are used, then pieces can move automatically, but one piece cannot cross other pieces and movement path is lengthened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic piece movementVSAvoidmovement path length
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies magnetic levitation to lift pieces vertically off the board surface, enabling three-dimensional movement. This allows pieces to jump over obstacles in the horizontal plane without increasing path length, as the vertical dimension provides a direct route across blocked areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical contact-based movement systems with magnetic field-based levitation and propulsion. Electromagnetic coils generate repulsive forces to lift pieces and directional magnetic fields to propel them, eliminating mechanical constraints that prevented crossing other pieces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Extent of automation

If magnetic moving pieces are used, then pieces can move automatically, but pieces may scratch the board after long-term movement and friction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic piece movementVSAvoidboard scratching and wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates direct mechanical contact between moving pieces and the board by using magnetic levitation. Pieces are suspended above the board surface by repulsive magnetic forces, so movement occurs through magnetic fields rather than physical friction, preventing scratching and wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces magnetic fields as an intermediary between the board and moving pieces. The electromagnetic coils create a magnetic cushion that holds pieces aloft and propels them, serving as a non-contact transmission medium that avoids direct mechanical interaction and associated damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If mechanical arm or mechanical structure is used to move pieces, then pieces can be moved automatically, but the board becomes larger and less aesthetic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic piece movementVSAvoidboard area
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces external mechanical arms with integrated electromagnetic coil systems built into the board surface. The coils are embedded within the board structure, using electrical energy to generate magnetic forces for piece movement, thereby eliminating the need for large external mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the movement mechanism directly with the board structure by integrating electromagnetic coils into the board itself. This consolidation eliminates separate mechanical arm components, keeping the board compact and aesthetically pleasing while maintaining automatic movement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Extent of automation

If mechanical arm or mechanical structure is used to move pieces, then pieces can be moved automatically, but there is a risk of mechanical injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic piece movementVSAvoidrisk of mechanical injury
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical contact-based movement with magnetic field-based levitation and propulsion. Pieces are moved through non-contact magnetic forces, eliminating mechanical contact that could cause injury, wear, or failure of the movement system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses magnetic fields as an intermediary to transfer movement forces from the board to the pieces. This non-contact interaction eliminates direct mechanical contact, reducing the risk of mechanical injury while maintaining precise and reliable piece movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves movement speed, saves game time, enhances the ornamental value and appeal of the game, and reduces noise and wear from friction, while maintaining safety and aesthetics.

Implementation Method 1

an electromagnetic coil configured to generate a magnetic force when activated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 2

the at least four electromagnetic coils are configured to generate a magnetic force so that under the combined effect of the magnetic force generated by the at least four electromagnetic coils, the piece to be moved can levitate relative to the board and maintain a position unchanged relative to the piece driving base during movement of the piece driving base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

an electromagnetic sensor configured to detect the strength of the magnetic field generated by the electromagnetic coil inside the piece to be moved above the piece driving base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field detection: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 4

a wireless charging chip configured to utilize the electromagnetic coil to charge the battery unit when the piece is not activated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20250065217A1Levitated chess and method for controlling levitated movement of game pieces
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 WENG YAN
  • US20250065217A1 patent drawing
  • US20250065217A1 patent drawing
  • US20250065217A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A levitated chess and a method for controlling the levitated movement of pieces are provided. The levitated chess includes a board; a plurality of pieces; and a piece driving base located inside the board, where, in response to a piece moving instruction, the piece driving base moves to a corresponding position below the piece to be moved; the piece driving base and the piece to be moved respectively generate repulsive magnetic forces against each other, so that the piece to be moved is levitated relative to the board; the piece driving base drives the piece to be moved to move to a placement position; and the piece driving base changes the generated magnetic force to enable the piece to be moved to fall down.