Levitation Melting Casting Method for Turbine Blades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Levitation melting methods are limited by their inability to handle large quantities of material and result in material loss and contamination, making industrial-scale production of high-quality cast items challenging.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of alternating electromagnetic fields to levitate and melt conductive materials, allowing them to be poured directly into a mould without contact with a crucible or platform, enabling efficient filling and solidification within a vacuum or protective gas environment, and using rotating and translating moulds to optimize filling and minimize turbulence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If full-levitation melting methods are used, then contamination is avoided and material quality is improved, but the quantity of material that can be melted is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial qualityVSAvoidquantity of material
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The melting process is divided into two distinct phases: first, a small quantity of material is melted using full-levitation melting to achieve contamination-free molten material; second, this molten material is used to preheat a large charge of material that is then melted using induction heating in contact with a water-cooled crucible. This segmentation allows each phase to optimize for its specific purpose, resolving the contradiction between quality and quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A small quantity of material is preliminarily melted using full-levitation melting before the main melting process. This preliminary molten material serves to preheat the large charge of material and the water-cooled crucible, preparing the system for subsequent large-scale melting while maintaining contamination-free conditions for the initial melt that will contact the main charge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Quantity of substance

If semi-levitating methods are used, then larger quantities of material can be melted, but material loss occurs due to contamination with the platform

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of materialVSAvoidmaterial loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful contact between the melt and the platform is eliminated by extracting the levitation function to the initial melting phase only. The main melting process uses induction heating with a water-cooled crucible, completely separating the melting function from any supporting platform, thus preventing contamination and material loss while enabling large-scale processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical support system (platform) that causes contamination is replaced with an electromagnetic field system for the initial melting, followed by induction heating for the main process. This substitution eliminates the mechanical contact that causes material loss while maintaining the ability to process large quantities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Quantity of substance

If semi-levitating methods are used, then larger quantities of material can be melted, but pouring into moulds becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of materialVSAvoidpouring ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A water-cooled crucible serves as an intermediary container that receives the preliminarily melted material and then facilitates the transfer of the large charge to the mould. The crucible acts as a mediator that enables easy pouring by providing a controlled release mechanism, resolving the contradiction between handling large quantities and maintaining pouring ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If full-levitation melting is used for industrial-scale production, then material quality is improved, but throughput is limited due to the small quantity of material that can be kept suspended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial qualityVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The production process is segmented into a quality-critical phase (full-levitation melting of small charge) and a throughput-critical phase (induction heating of large charge in water-cooled crucible). This segmentation allows the system to achieve both high material quality and high throughput by optimizing each phase for its specific objective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The small charge is preliminarily melted using full-levitation melting to create a high-quality molten material that will subsequently initiate and control the melting of the large charge. This preliminary action ensures that the main production process starts with contamination-free material, guaranteeing quality while enabling large-scale throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for high-throughput, high-quality cast item production with reduced material loss and contamination, enabling industrial-scale production of complex shapes while avoiding the limitations of traditional levitation and semi-levitation methods.

Implementation Method 1

a melting method in which the conductive melt material is heated by means of inductive currents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInductive heating: Induction Heating

Implementation Method 2

heated by means of inductive currents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

simultaneously made to float freely by means of electrodynamic effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrodynamic effect: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS10843259B2Casting method
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 ALD VACUUM TECH GMBH
  • US10843259B2 patent drawing
  • US10843259B2 patent drawing
  • US10843259B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing cast items in a casting method, wherein a charge of a conductive material is introduced into the sphere of influence of at least one alternating electromagnetic field, so that the charge is kept in a levitating state. The melt is poured into moulds in order to produce turbine blades, prostheses or turbocharger impellers.