Lewis Base Depolymerization for Fiber Recovery from FRPs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current recycling methods for fiber reinforced polymers (FRPs) are inefficient, as mechanical recycling fails to separate polymer from fibers, thermal recycling weakens fibers, and chemical recycling is expensive and hazardous, necessitating an environmentally friendly and cost-effective process to recover valuable, intact fibers.

Innovation Solution

The use of a Lewis base with a boiling point of at least 150°C to depolymerize the polymer matrix of FRPs, allowing for the recovery of free fibers by forming a recycle admixture with the Lewis base and heating it to a temperature above 150°C, thereby partially decomposing the polymer and separating the fibers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If mechanical recycling is used to recover fibers from FRPs, then the polymer can be processed into particles, but the polymer cannot be separated from the fibers and fiber length cannot be controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiber recovery processVSAvoidfiber length control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameter of the polymer matrix by introducing a Lewis base that selectively interacts with the polymer's functional groups. This chemical parameter change enables controlled depolymerization at moderate temperatures, allowing fiber separation while maintaining fiber length integrity, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The Lewis base acts as an intermediary substance that mediates between the polymer matrix and the fibers. It selectively binds to the polymer matrix, enabling controlled separation without directly acting on the fibers, thus preserving fiber length while facilitating polymer removal and achieving both ease of manufacture and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If thermal recycling via pyrolysis is used to recover fibers, then the polymer can be combusted to leave recoverable fibers, but the recovered fibers are weakened and charred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiber integrityVSAvoidfiber strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter from very high pyrolysis temperatures to moderate temperatures (below the boiling point of the Lewis base). This parameter change prevents fiber degradation and charring while still enabling polymer depolymerization, thus maintaining fiber strength and integrity without sacrificing fiber recovery capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal-mechanical pyrolysis system with a chemical system based on Lewis base-polymer interactions. This substitution eliminates the need for extreme temperatures that cause fiber damage, allowing fiber recovery while preserving fiber strength and avoiding charring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If chemical recycling with supercritical pressure is used to depolymerize the polymer, then the polymer can be converted into oligomers or monomers, but the process is expensive and dangerous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymer depolymerizationVSAvoidprocess safety and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pressure parameter from supercritical or near-supercritical levels to atmospheric or moderate pressures. By using a Lewis base that can depolymerize the polymer at lower pressures, the process becomes safer and less expensive while still achieving effective polymer breakdown and fiber recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a Lewis base that can be used in moderate quantities at atmospheric pressure, replacing expensive and hazardous supercritical conditions. The Lewis base serves as a cost-effective, safer alternative that achieves polymer depolymerization without the high costs and safety risks of supercritical processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Ease of manufacture

If chemical recycling with ionic liquids is used to depolymerize the polymer, then the polymer can be converted into oligomers or monomers, but the ionic liquids are expensive and susceptible to degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymer depolymerizationVSAvoidchemical stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive and degradation-prone ionic liquids with a Lewis base that is more stable and cost-effective. The Lewis base maintains the ability to depolymerize the polymer while being less susceptible to oxidation and ionization degradation, thus improving reliability and reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical nature of the depolymerization agent from ionic liquids to a Lewis base with specific boiling point characteristics. This parameter change results in a reagent that is more stable under processing conditions and less prone to degradation, while still achieving effective polymer breakdown.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively recovers high-value, intact fibers while minimizing environmental impact and costs, as demonstrated by the successful separation and cleaning of carbon and glass fibers using specific Lewis bases like triphenylphosphine oxide and triphenylphosphine sulfide, with the Lewis base process being significantly more cost-effective than traditional methods.

Implementation Method 1

heating it to a temperature above 150°C, thereby partially depolymerizing the polymer and separating the fibers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDepolymerization:

Implementation Method 2

The present invention discloses the use of a Lewis base to recover free fibers from a fiber reinforced polymer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLewis acid-base interaction:

Data Source

PatentEP3736306B1Recovery of fibers from fiber reinforced polymers with lewis bases
Publication Date: 2022.04.13 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3736306B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3736306B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3736306B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A composition comprising a Lewis base containing depolymerization liquid and methods of using the Lewis base depolymerization liquid to depolymerize the polymer component of fiber reinforced polymers to form free fibers.