Lithium Iron Phosphate Particle Distribution for Higher Compacted Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lithium iron phosphate positive electrode materials suffer from lower compacted density and inferior electrochemical capacity compared to ternary materials, necessitating improvements in both areas to enhance energy density.

Innovation Solution

A lithium iron phosphate material with a specific particle size distribution, including a volume proportion of particles less than 1 µm (X) ranging from 50% to 75%, particles greater than or equal to 3 µm (Z) ranging from 5% to 25%, and a bimodal particle size distribution with a peak range of 0.5 µm to 2 µm, achieving a compacted density of 2.46 g/cm³ to 2.55 g/cm³, is prepared through mixing, sintering, and pulverization processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If lithium iron phosphate material is used as positive electrode material, then safety and cycle performance are improved, but compacted density and energy density deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle performance and safetyVSAvoidcompacted density
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the particle size distribution parameters of lithium iron phosphate material. Specifically, it controls the volume proportion of particles with D<1μm to be 50-75%, particles with 1μm≤D<3μm to be 20-40%, and particles with D≥3μm to be 5-25%. This parameter optimization enables the material to achieve both high compacted density (2.46-2.55 g/cm³) and maintain its inherent safety and cycle performance advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating different particle size regions within the material composition. The bimodal distribution with peaks at 0.5-2μm and 5-15μm creates complementary local structures: fine particles fill voids between coarse particles, while coarse particles provide structural framework. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between density and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If particle size is reduced to improve electrochemical performance, then rate capability is improved, but compacted density deteriorates due to excessive voids

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate capabilityVSAvoidcompacted density
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the nested doll principle through its particle size distribution design where fine particles (D<1μm, 50-75% volume proportion) nest within and fill the void spaces between larger particles (D≥3μm, 5-25% volume proportion). The intermediate particles (1μm≤D<3μm, 20-40% volume proportion) provide additional filling. This nested arrangement maximizes space utilization, achieving high compacted density (2.46-2.55 g/cm³) while maintaining the rate capability benefits of fine particles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies composite materials principle by creating a composite particle size distribution system with two distinct peaks (0.5-2μm and 5-15μm). This composite structure combines the advantages of different particle sizes: fine particles provide high rate capability and fill voids, while coarse particles contribute to compacted density. The resulting composite particle system resolves the contradiction between rate performance and density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The adjusted particle size distribution improves the compacted density and maintains stable electrochemical performance, enhancing the material's energy density and application range without degrading its electrochemical capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

the granulation is performed by spray drying, where process parameters of the spray drying include: a supply speed of the mixed slurry ranging from 50 mL/min to 200 mL/min, an air inlet temperature ranging from 225 °C to 255 °C, and an air outlet temperature ranging from 95 °C to 120 °C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpray drying: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

the sintering includes a first-stage sintering and a second-stage sintering, where the first-stage sintering is performed at a temperature ranging from 450 °C to 550 °C, for a duration of sintering ranging from 2 h to 4 h; and the second-stage sintering is performed at a temperature ranging from 790 °C to 805 °C, for a duration of sintering ranging from 8 h to 12 h

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentEP4624417A1Lithium iron phosphate material, preparation method and use
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 GUIZHOU CNGR XINGYANG ENERGY STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
  • EP4624417A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4624417A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4624417A1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The present invention discloses a lithium iron phosphate material, a preparation method and use. The lithium iron phosphate material includes lithium iron phosphate particles, where a volume proportion of the lithium iron phosphate particles having a particle size D less than 1 µm is X, 50%&lt;X≤75%, and a volume proportion of the lithium iron phosphate particles having the particle size D greater than or equal to 3 µm is Z, 5%&lt;Z&lt;25%. The lithium iron phosphate material provided in the present invention, through adjustment of the particle size distribution, can improve the compacted density of a finished material thereof while maintaining stable electrochemical performance thereof, so that the material achieves an effect of filling part of materials with a small particle size between materials with a large particle size, thus further improving the compacted density thereof, and such similar particle size distribution behavior will not degrade the electrochemical performance of the material.