Li-Ion Charging Current Threshold Control for Lithium Plating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lithium ion battery charging methods fail to sufficiently suppress lithium metal precipitation, especially when using chargers with low performance, leading to potential short-circuits.

Innovation Solution

A charging method that determines two threshold values for the charging current: a first threshold value at which lithium metal precipitation is likely to occur, and a second threshold value at which precipitation is always suppressed. The method controls the charging current using the difference between these threshold values to prevent excessive lithium metal precipitation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the charging current is lowered after the terminal voltage reaches the Li precipitation start voltage, then the Li precipitation is suppressed, but the charging time increases and charging efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelithium metal precipitation suppressionVSAvoidcharging time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by predicting the Li precipitation start voltage in advance using an equivalent circuit model and open-circuit voltage information before it actually occurs. This allows the charging current to be reduced proactively, preventing Li precipitation while maintaining efficient charging. The controller calculates the predicted Li precipitation start voltage and compares it with the actual terminal voltage to determine when to adjust charging current, rather than waiting for Li precipitation to actually occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the terminal voltage, charging current, and open-circuit voltage, and using this information to dynamically adjust the charging current. The equivalent circuit model provides real-time prediction of Li precipitation risk, and the controller adjusts charging parameters based on this feedback to prevent Li precipitation while optimizing charging efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If the charging current control response is slow due to low charger performance, then the charger is simpler and cheaper, but lithium metal precipitation occurs because the current decrease is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharger performance requirementsVSAvoidlithium metal precipitation suppression
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by predicting the Li precipitation start voltage in advance using an equivalent circuit model and open-circuit voltage information before it actually occurs. This allows the charging current to be reduced proactively, preventing Li precipitation even with slow-responding chargers. The controller calculates the predicted Li precipitation start voltage and compares it with the actual terminal voltage to determine when to adjust charging current, rather than waiting for Li precipitation to actually occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the terminal voltage, charging current, and open-circuit voltage, and using this information to dynamically adjust the charging current. The equivalent circuit model provides real-time prediction of Li precipitation risk, and the controller adjusts charging parameters based on this feedback to prevent Li precipitation while optimizing charging efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the first charging current or first charging power is increased to improve charging speed, then the charging efficiency increases, but the Li precipitation start voltage decreases making precipitation more likely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidlithium metal precipitation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by predicting the Li precipitation start voltage in advance using an equivalent circuit model and open-circuit voltage information before it actually occurs. This allows the charging current to be reduced proactively, preventing Li precipitation even when high charging currents are applied. The controller calculates the predicted Li precipitation start voltage and compares it with the actual terminal voltage to determine when to adjust charging current, rather than waiting for Li precipitation to actually occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the terminal voltage, charging current, and open-circuit voltage, and using this information to dynamically adjust the charging current. The equivalent circuit model provides real-time prediction of Li precipitation risk, and the controller adjusts charging parameters based on this feedback to prevent Li precipitation while optimizing charging efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250030067A1Charging method and charging system
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US20250030067A1 patent drawing
  • US20250030067A1 patent drawing
  • US20250030067A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A charging method includes: determining, for charging current of a lithium ion battery, first and a second threshold values each representing a current boundary value at which precipitation of lithium metal becomes likely to occur on an electrode of the lithium ion battery; and controlling the charging current of the lithium ion battery using a difference between the first and second threshold values, and the second threshold value. The first threshold value represents a current boundary value at which precipitation of the lithium metal becomes likely to occur when the charging current of the lithium ion battery exceeds the first threshold value. The second threshold value is 10 smaller than the first threshold value, and represents a current boundary value at which precipitation of the lithium metal becomes likely to occur when the charging current of the lithium ion battery continuously exceeds the second threshold value.