Liability Estimation System Using Accident Characteristic Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Motor vehicle accident claims organizations face challenges in accurately assessing liability due to ineffective negotiation, high case loads, inadequate time, and a lack of experienced claims adjusters, often resulting in inadequate and inequitable assessments, particularly with new adjusters making 'best guess' assessments.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for estimating liability in vehicle accidents based on multiple characteristics, including roadway configuration, accident type, right of way, and impact points, using a knowledge acquisition utility to determine impact groups and adjust liability estimates with situational weights and factor influences, incorporating expert knowledge from experienced claims adjusters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If claims adjusters assess liability quickly to avoid litigation, then productivity increases, but measurement precision of liability assessment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaims processing speedVSAvoidliability assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a virtual model of the accident by copying and analyzing key characteristics (roadway configuration, accident type, traffic controls, right of way, impact points) from the actual case, comparing it against a database of past accidents to determine liability without requiring extensive manual investigation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical human judgment process with an automated computer-based system that systematically evaluates accident characteristics and applies liability rules, eliminating the need for adjusters to manually analyze each factor while ensuring consistent and accurate assessments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If training regimen for new claims adjusters is shortened, then ease of manufacture of skilled adjusters improves, but reliability of liability assessment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjuster training efficiencyVSAvoidliability assessment quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables new adjusters to independently assess liability by providing them with a computer-based tool that automatically guides them through the analysis process, eliminating their need for extensive training in complex liability determination while ensuring reliable assessments through systematic computer analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If claims adjusters conduct rigorous investigation of accident characteristics, then measurement precision of liability assessment improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliability assessment accuracyVSAvoidinvestigation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by automatically evaluating the five key accident characteristics and comparing them against a database of past accidents before the adjuster completes their investigation, providing an early liability estimate that guides further investigation and reduces total time required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7818187B2Computerized method and system for estimating liability
Publication Date: 2010.10.19 COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP
  • US7818187B2 patent drawing
  • US7818187B2 patent drawing
  • US7818187B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented methods and systems for estimating liability for a vehicle accident are provided. In one embodiment, an actual speed of a vehicle involved in an accident may be estimated. At least one specified speed of a vehicle involved in the accident may be provided to a computer system. In an embodiment, the specified speed may be a speed limit. In other embodiments, the specified speed may be a safe speed of the vehicle involved in an accident. The actual speed may be compared to at least one specified speed. In some embodiments, an effect on liability may be estimated based on the comparison.