Library Cell Exclusion for Delay Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional circuit synthesis approaches rely on iterative trial-and-error methods with discretized delay models, leading to inefficiencies and poor quality results, especially for large designs with many timing constraints, due to the inaccuracy of linear delay models.

Innovation Solution

The use of numerical delay models for optimizing circuit designs by excluding library cells with specific logical and parasitic delay values that exceed certain thresholds, allowing for iterative refinement of generic values to improve model accuracy and reduce timing violations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If iterative trial-and-error optimization is used to size cells, then timing constraints can be checked and violated cell sizes rejected, but the process takes too long to complete especially for large circuit designs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming constraint satisfactionVSAvoidoptimization speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing delay values for library cells across multiple process corners and modes before the actual synthesis optimization begins. This pre-computation creates lookup tables that allow the optimizer to quickly assess timing impacts without performing full timing analysis during each iterative trial, thereby maintaining timing constraint satisfaction while dramatically reducing optimization time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If linear delay models are used for cell sizing, then the optimization process is simplified, but the model accuracy is insufficient leading to many timing violations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization process complexityVSAvoiddelay model accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from a simple linear delay model to a more accurate delay model that incorporates multiple parameters including process corner variations, mode-specific behaviors, and cell size dependencies. The patent computes delay values as functions of these parameters and stores them in lookup tables, allowing the synthesis tool to accurately predict timing behavior while maintaining computational efficiency through pre-computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive timing analysis is performed across many process corners and modes, then timing constraint accuracy is improved, but the computational time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming analysis accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-computing delay values for all library cells across all process corners and modes before synthesis begins. These pre-computed values are stored in lookup tables organized by process corner, mode, and cell type. During actual synthesis, the tool simply queries these tables rather than performing comprehensive timing analysis, achieving both high accuracy and fast computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by computing and storing only the specific delay parameters needed for the numerical optimization process, rather than performing complete timing analysis for every possible scenario. The lookup tables contain pre-computed delay values for the relevant process corners and modes, providing sufficient accuracy for optimization without the computational burden of exhaustive timing analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8949764B2Excluding library cells for delay optimization in numerical synthesis
Publication Date: 2015.02.03 SYNOPSYS INC
  • US8949764B2 patent drawing
  • US8949764B2 patent drawing
  • US8949764B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for excluding library cells are described. Some embodiments receive a generic logical effort value and optionally a generic parasitic delay value for a timing arc of a library cell type. Next, library cells of the library cell type are excluded whose specific logical effort values for the timing arc are greater than the generic logical effort value by more than a first threshold and/or optionally whose specific parasitic delay values for the timing arc are greater than the generic parasitic delay value by more than a second threshold. A new generic logical effort value and optionally a new generic parasitic delay value can be determined based on at least some of the remaining library cells. The process of excluding library cells and determining new generic logical effort values and optionally new generic parasitic delay values can be performed iteratively.