Library Dependency Detection via ML Confidence Graphs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Incompatibility among third-party libraries in computer codes can lead to compilation and runtime errors, making it challenging to determine compatible library versions for use in programming.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based method is employed to identify dependency relationships among libraries, create a configurable L-layer tree-like graph, and determine the most suitable library versions by predicting confidence values, ensuring compatible combinations are selected for use in application packages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple third-party libraries are imported into computer codes, then the functionality and capabilities of the application are improved, but incompatibility among libraries can produce compilation and runtime errors

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidcompatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of library dependencies before the application runs. It builds a dependency graph, identifies potential conflicts, and pre-resolves compatibility issues, preventing compilation and runtime errors before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The dependency analysis system acts as an intermediary between the application and multiple libraries. It manages library compatibility by analyzing dependency relationships and selecting compatible library versions, allowing the application to utilize multiple libraries without direct conflict.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual analysis of library dependencies is performed, then compatibility can be verified, but the process becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility verificationVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical analysis with automated computational analysis. It uses algorithms to traverse dependency graphs, detect conflicts, and resolve compatibility issues automatically, eliminating the time-consuming manual process while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The dependency analysis system performs self-service by automatically analyzing its own dependency relationships without requiring manual intervention. It independently builds dependency graphs, identifies conflicts, and resolves compatibility issues, saving developer time and effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If deep nested dependencies among libraries are analyzed, then comprehensive compatibility detection is achieved, but the complexity of detection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex dependency analysis into manageable components: building individual dependency graphs for each library, identifying specific conflict types, and applying targeted resolution strategies. This modular approach maintains detection accuracy while reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the complex multi-dimensional dependency problem into a graphical representation with clear layers and relationships. By visualizing dependencies as a graph structure with nodes and edges, it simplifies the analysis of deep nested dependencies while maintaining comprehensive detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20240086730A1Multiple library dependency detection
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240086730A1 patent drawing
  • US20240086730A1 patent drawing
  • US20240086730A1 patent drawing

AI summary

At least one processor identifies dependency relationships among libraries in a repository of libraries. Using the dependency relationships among libraries, at least one machine learning model can be created that predicts with a confidence value a dependency between a given library and a target library. An L layer tree-like graph can be created, using the dependency relationships among libraries and an application package. L can be configurable. Versions of the libraries to use can be determined by running the at least one machine learning model for each pair of nodes having a dependency relationship in the L layer tree-like graph, the at least one machine learning model identifying the dependency relationship with a confidence value, where pairs of nodes having largest confidence values are selected as the versions of the libraries to use in the application package.