License Plate Recognition Confidence-Based Update

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Advanced Automatic License Plate Recognition (ALPR) systems face challenges in providing consistently reliable and detailed vehicle identification data due to variations in image quality and environmental conditions, which affect confidence scores and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that captures and analyzes images of license plates over time, using multiple automated analyses and confidence scores to selectively update a matrix of license plate identification values, ensuring accurate and reliable data by replacing values based on higher confidence scores from subsequent images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single automated analysis is performed on license plate images, then the processing speed is maintained, but the accuracy and reliability of vehicle identification data deteriorates due to image quality variations and environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of license plate recognitionVSAvoidcomplexity of multiple automated analyses
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of automated analyses performed on license plate images based on confidence scores. When initial analysis confidence is low (indicating poor image quality or environmental conditions), the system automatically performs additional analyses to improve accuracy. When confidence is high, fewer analyses are performed, maintaining processing efficiency. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by adapting system complexity to actual needs rather than applying a fixed number of analyses to all images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where confidence scores from automated analyses feed into decisions about whether to perform additional analyses. The confidence score acts as feedback that triggers either acceptance of current results or initiation of further analysis cycles. This feedback loop enables the system to automatically improve accuracy when needed while avoiding unnecessary processing when confidence is already high, thus resolving the accuracy-complexity contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple automated analyses are performed on license plate images, then the accuracy and reliability of vehicle identification data improves, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of vehicle identification dataVSAvoidprocessing time for image analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the number of analysis iterations based on real-time confidence score evaluation. Instead of performing a fixed number of analyses on all images, the system adapts the processing depth to each image's characteristics. Images with poor quality or environmental challenges trigger additional analyses, while high-quality images are processed more quickly. This dynamic adaptation reduces average processing time while maintaining high reliability across diverse image conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of analysis iteration count based on confidence score thresholds. When confidence scores fall below certain thresholds (indicating potential errors), the system automatically increases the number of analyses performed. When scores exceed thresholds, the system reduces iterations. This parameter-based adaptation allows the system to maintain high reliability only when necessary, thereby reducing overall processing time and computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If confidence scores are used to selectively update license plate data, then the data accuracy improves, but the system complexity increases due to multiple comparison and replacement operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of license plate identification valuesVSAvoidcomplexity of data update mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a self-service data update mechanism where the database automatically compares confidence scores and replaces identification values without manual intervention. The update logic is embedded in the system, allowing it to autonomously determine when and how to update data based on confidence score comparisons. This self-service approach masks the underlying complexity by providing automatic updates, making the system appear simpler while maintaining high accuracy through systematic confidence-based replacement operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11501542B2Unified reading solution for vehicles
Publication Date: 2022.11.15 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US11501542B2 patent drawing
  • US11501542B2 patent drawing
  • US11501542B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system and computer program product for progressively updating at least one matrix of license plate identification values is disclosed. At a vehicle presence time, an image is captured within which is shown a uniquely identifiable license plate of a vehicle. Analytics is carried out on the image to obtain, in relation to the uniquely identifiable license plate, at least four values in relation to both a license plate number and at least one additional plate-identifying information. The matrix of license plate identification values is populated with the at least four values and stored in a database.