Cooking Appliance Lid Safety Cam for Simple Cover Interlock

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical cooking appliances face challenges in ensuring safety and simplicity, as they often require complex and costly designs with integrated electrical circuits in the lid, which can pose safety risks and increase manufacturing complexity.

Innovation Solution

A domestic electrical cooking appliance with a removable cover that uses a control finger to actuate a cam, which in turn opens or closes the electrical circuit, eliminating the need for circuit components on the lid and allowing for the use of simplified safety switches, while ensuring safety through an elastic element that returns the circuit to an open position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electrical components are integrated into the cover to detect cover position, then safety can be ensured, but the cover becomes complex and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcover complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the electrical circuit components from the cover and relocates them to the housing. The cover is reduced to a simple mechanical structure with a control finger, while the housing contains the cam and safety switch. This extraction eliminates the need for complex electrical integration in the cover while maintaining safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a cam as an intermediary mechanical element that translates the control finger's movement into switch actuation. The cam converts the cover's positional information into mechanical motion that directly operates the safety switch, eliminating the need for complex electrical sensors in the cover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If the control key actuation direction is restricted to depression only, then simplified switches can be used, but the design freedom for switch installation is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitch costVSAvoidswitch installation freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the dimension of control key actuation from lateral or angular forces to vertical depression force. By designing the cam to push the control key downward in the direction of depression, the system uses the third dimension (vertical) to resolve the conflict between switch simplicity and installation flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If the cover is made simple without electrical components, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but safety detection capability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover simplicityVSAvoidsafety detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electrical detection systems with a mechanical detection and actuation system. The control finger mechanically engages the cam, which mechanically actuates the safety switch. This mechanical substitution maintains safety detection capability while keeping the cover simple and free of electrical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a safe and cost-effective electrical cooking appliance with a simple lid design, reducing manufacturing complexity and ensuring safety by using a control finger to actuate the cam, which opens or closes the electrical circuit, and an elastic element for automatic return to the open position, thus preventing electrical supply when the cover is incorrectly positioned or removed.

Implementation Method 1

a cam with at least one control surface arranged to actuate a control key of said at least one safety switch in a direction of depression of the command key

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical contact force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

an elastic element that returns the circuit to an open position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentEP2900114B1Household electrical cooking appliance
Publication Date: 2018.07.11 SEB SA
  • EP2900114B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The invention relates to a household electrical food-cooking appliance including: a housing (10) having a container (20) arranged such as to receive the food to be cooked; a removable cover (30) arranged such as to close the container (20) while cooking; at least one safety switch (41, 45) arranged in the housing (10) in order to turn on at least one electrical circuit of the appliance when the cover (30) is not closing the container (20) and in order to turn off said at least one electrical circuit when the cover (30) is closing the container (20); and a cam (50) having at least one control surface (52, 56) arranged such as to actuate a key (42, 46) for controlling said at least one safety switch (41, 45) in a direction in which the control key (42, 46) is pressed. Said appliance is characterized in that the cover (30) includes a control finger (31) arranged such as to actuate a surface (53) for inputting the cam (50) in a direction for moving the input surface (53) in a direction that is different from the one in which the key is pressed while the container (20) is open, such as to turn on said at least one electrical circuit, and while the container (20) is closed, such as to turn off said at least one electrical circuit.