LiDAR Beam Divergence Simulation Using Multi-Ray Intensity Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current LiDAR simulations in autonomous vehicles fail to accurately capture beam divergence effects, leading to inaccurate object detection and noise modeling due to the use of single rays and neglect of energy dissipation with distance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a beam divergence model using multiple rays with intensity adjustments based on gaussian distribution and a noise model to simulate variance in range measurements, accounting for beam spot size and energy dissipation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single ray is used to simulate LiDAR beam transmission, then the simulation is computationally simple, but the accuracy of object detection and noise modeling deteriorates due to failure to capture beam divergence effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation complexityVSAvoidobject detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The LiDAR beam is segmented into multiple discrete rays (e.g., 9 rays) distributed across the beam profile, including a central ray and peripheral rays. This segmentation allows the simulation to capture beam divergence effects and energy distribution while maintaining computational efficiency compared to continuous modeling approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation dynamically adjusts the intensity parameter of each ray based on its position within the beam profile and distance traveled. Rays farther from the beam center have reduced intensity to model energy dissipation, while closer rays maintain higher intensity. This parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by adding physical accuracy without requiring complex computational models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If energy dissipation with distance is neglected in the simulation, then the computational model remains simple, but the noise modeling accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational model complexityVSAvoidnoise modeling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The intensity parameter of each ray is modified as a function of distance traveled through the environment. This parameter change models energy dissipation physically, where rays traveling farther from the source exhibit greater intensity reduction. This approach improves noise modeling reliability while keeping the computational model relatively simple by using straightforward intensity attenuation rather than complex physical simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple rays with intensity adjustments are used to model beam divergence, then object detection accuracy and noise modeling improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection accuracyVSAvoidsimulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The beam is divided into a finite number of discrete rays (e.g., 9 rays) rather than treating it as a continuous distribution. This segmentation enables accurate modeling of beam divergence and energy distribution while maintaining computational tractability. The discrete ray approach balances measurement precision with manageable simulation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation uses a moderate number of rays (e.g., 9 rays) that provides sufficient accuracy for capturing beam divergence effects without over-complicating the model. This partial action approach achieves adequate modeling fidelity for autonomous vehicle applications without the computational burden of much finer discretization or continuous models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more realistic LiDAR simulations, improving object detection accuracy and noise modeling, thereby optimizing machine learning models for autonomous vehicle operations.

Implementation Method 1

generating, within a simulation environment, at least one virtual beam transmission from a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor using a beam divergence model

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeam divergence: Diffraction

Implementation Method 2

adjusting the one or more intensity parameters based on one or more transmission intensity weights corresponding to the one or more rays to yield one or more modified intensity parameters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGaussian distribution:

Implementation Method 3

determining one or more intensity parameters associated with one or more virtual beam receptions by the LiDAR sensor, wherein the one or more virtual beam receptions correspond to one or more rays from the plurality of rays that are reflected from one or more virtual objects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 4

a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor can be used to determine ranges (variable distance) of one or more targets by directing a laser to a surface of an entity (e.g., a person, an object, a structure, an animal, etc.) and measuring the time for light reflected from the surface to return to the LiDAR

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentUS20240220675A1Light ranging and detection (LIDAR) beam divergence simulation
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 GM CRUISE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US20240220675A1 patent drawing
  • US20240220675A1 patent drawing
  • US20240220675A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques are provided for simulating LiDAR sensors. An example method includes generating, within a simulation environment, at least one virtual beam transmission from a LiDAR sensor using a beam divergence model, wherein the at least one virtual beam transmission includes a plurality of rays; determining one or more intensity parameters associated with one or more virtual beam receptions by the LiDAR sensor, wherein the one or more virtual beam receptions correspond to one or more rays from the plurality of rays that are reflected from one or more virtual objects; adjusting the one or more intensity parameters based on one or more transmission intensity weights corresponding to the one or more rays to yield one or more modified intensity parameters; and determining at least one object intensity parameter for each of the one or more virtual objects based on the one or more modified intensity parameters.