Fusing LIDAR and Camera Data for Object Action Classification

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in accurately classifying the actions of perceived objects, such as pedestrians, using existing sensor data, which is crucial for making appropriate driving decisions but lacks precision and historical context.

Innovation Solution

A method involving server computing devices that receive and sequence LIDAR sensor data frames with object bounding boxes and action labels, project them into camera images to create fused data, and train a deep neural network model to improve action classification precision, using historical labels to predict future object behaviors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If LIDAR sensor data alone is used for action classification, then the system is simpler, but the precision of action classification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines LIDAR sensor data with camera images to create fused sensor data. The LIDAR data provides precise depth and spatial information while camera images provide visual context, together enabling more accurate action classification than either sensor alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a deep neural network model as an intermediary that processes and fuses LIDAR sensor data with camera images. This model learns to combine features from both data sources to improve action classification precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If historical action labels are used for prediction, then the context awareness improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses historical action labels from previous time steps as input to predict current object actions. This temporal context allows the model to understand object behavior patterns and improve prediction reliability by considering past actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The model incorporates feedback from historical action labels and previous predictions to continuously improve action classification. The sequential processing allows the model to learn from past predictions and adjust current classifications accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11061406B2Object action classification for autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2021.07.13
  • US11061406B2 patent drawing
  • US11061406B2 patent drawing
  • US11061406B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate to training and using a model for identifying actions of objects. For instance, LIDAR sensor data frames including an object bounding box corresponding to an object as well as an action label for the bounding box may be received. Each sensor frame is associated with a timestamp and is sequenced with respect to other sensor frames. Each given sensor data frame may be projected into a camera image of the object based on the timestamp associated with the given sensor data frame in order to provide fused data. The model may be trained using the fused data such that the model is configured to, in response to receiving fused data, the model outputs an action label for each object bounding box of the fused data. This output may then be used to control a vehicle in an autonomous driving mode.