Lidar Dynamic Alignment via Feedback Sensing Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

LIDAR systems face challenges in reliably detecting objects in varying environmental conditions such as rain, fog, darkness, and bright light, which affects their performance in autonomous vehicles, leading to misalignments that degrade signal detection and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

Dynamic Alignment (DA) mechanisms are introduced to compensate for misalignments by adding controllable degrees of freedom to optical path elements, using feedback sensors to adjust components and maintain system performance across different conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If LIDAR systems operate in varying environmental conditions (rain, fog, darkness, bright light), then the system must maintain reliable detection capability, but environmental factors cause misalignments that degrade signal detection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidsignal detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback sensing elements (quad cells) that continuously monitor the alignment of optical components and provide real-time alignment data. This feedback mechanism enables the system to detect misalignments caused by environmental conditions and compensate for them, maintaining both detection reliability and measurement precision across varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic alignment mechanisms that can actively adjust optical components based on real-time conditions. Rather than relying on static alignment, the system dynamically compensates for misalignments caused by thermal expansion, mechanical stress, and environmental factors, ensuring consistent performance across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If Dynamic Alignment mechanisms are added to compensate for misalignments, then system robustness and accuracy are enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem robustnessVSAvoidalignment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The alignment system is segmented into independent functional modules: feedback sensing elements (quad cells) that monitor alignment, processing elements that analyze alignment data, and adjustment mechanisms that compensate for misalignments. This modular segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture despite the added complexity of dynamic alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The LIDAR system performs self-alignment through integrated feedback sensing elements that automatically detect and compensate for misalignments without external intervention. The system uses its own optical components as sensors to monitor alignment status and autonomously adjusts optical elements to maintain optimal performance, reducing the need for external calibration and complex manual alignment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If dedicated feedback sensing elements are used to monitor alignment, then alignment accuracy is improved, but manufacturing cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensing element complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback sensing elements (quad cells) serve multiple functions: they monitor optical alignment, detect environmental condition changes, and provide data for both immediate alignment compensation and long-term system calibration. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated sensors for each function, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while maintaining high alignment measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The quad cell sensing elements act as intermediaries between the optical path and the control system. Rather than requiring complex direct measurement of component alignment, the sensing elements convert alignment status into measurable electrical signals that can be processed and used to drive adjustment mechanisms, simplifying the overall measurement and control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Dynamic Alignment enhances the robustness and accuracy of LIDAR systems by compensating for environmental-induced misalignments, ensuring consistent performance in challenging conditions and extending the range of element tolerance during fabrication.

Implementation Method 1

reflected light spots that impinge on an array of feedback sensing elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20230375673A1Dynamic alignment of a lidar using dedicated feedback sensing elements
Publication Date: 2023.11.23 INNOVIZ TECH LTD
  • US20230375673A1 patent drawing
  • US20230375673A1 patent drawing
  • US20230375673A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A distance measurement (DM) optical sensor that includes (i) a 2D sensing array that includes sensing elements that include DM sensing elements and feedback sensing elements that are statically allocated to act as feedback sensing elements, (ii) output paths that include DM output paths and feedback output paths; and (iii) one or more processing circuits that are configured to: (a) trigger an outputting of DM output signals, trigger an outputting of feedback output signals, and (b) process the feedback output signals to determine a spatial relationship between an actual location of light sensed by at least some of the sensing elements and an expected location of the light.