LiDAR Optical Lens Alignment via LO Signal Fitting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

FMCW LiDAR systems face challenges in precisely aligning optical lenses to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio due to the difficulty in aligning the optical lens with respect to the local oscillator and target return signals, especially at high scan speeds which lead to spatial misalignment and reduced performance.

Innovation Solution

The method involves placing the optical lens at a test position, moving it laterally across the detector to determine the characteristic line shape using fitting functions like Gaussian or Sigmoid, and adjusting its position to find the minimum beam width, then applying an offset to achieve precise alignment along all three axes, thereby improving the signal-to-noise ratio and system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the optical lens is manually aligned with respect to the LO signal and target return signal, then the alignment precision can be improved, but the alignment time and system complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidalignment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-alignment by automatically measuring the LO signal distribution at multiple positions and using fitting functions to determine the optimal lens position. The processor autonomously calculates the beam center coordinates and adjusts the lens position without manual intervention, making the system self-sufficient in the alignment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical alignment with an automated optical measurement and computational system. Instead of physically adjusting the lens by hand, the system uses a detector to measure signal distribution, processes the data through fitting functions, and automatically determines the optimal position, substituting mechanical adjustment with optical-electrical-computational methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If the optical lens is precisely aligned to maximize signal-to-noise ratio, then the LiDAR system performance is improved, but the difficulty of alignment and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidalignment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a detector as an intermediary element between the LO signal and the processing system. The detector measures the signal distribution and provides data to the processor, which then uses fitting functions to determine the optimal lens position. This intermediary measurement system simplifies the alignment process while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the detector continuously measures the LO signal distribution at different lens positions, and the processor uses this feedback information to calculate the optimal position through fitting functions. This closed-loop approach ensures high signal-to-noise ratio while automating the alignment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the optical lens is aligned at high scan speeds, then the productivity of the LiDAR system is improved, but spatial misalignment occurs reducing measurement precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan speedVSAvoidspatial alignment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary alignment by measuring the LO signal distribution and determining the optimal lens position before the actual LiDAR scanning operation begins. This pre-alignment ensures that the lens is correctly positioned to handle high-speed scanning without spatial misalignment, maintaining measurement precision even at high productivity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate and fast alignment of the optical lens, enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio and overall performance of the LiDAR system by compensating for descan effects and maintaining efficient signal mixing.

Implementation Method 1

An optical lens is used to focus the target return signal and local signal onto the detector (e.g., photodetector)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical focusing: Lens

Implementation Method 2

A FMCW LiDAR system mixes a local oscillator (LO) signal (e.g., LO beam) with a target return signal (e.g., target beam), which is the reflected light from a target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20240255722A1Techniques for alignment of target and local oscillator beams to photodiode detector
Publication Date: 2024.08.01 AEVA INC
  • US20240255722A1 patent drawing
  • US20240255722A1 patent drawing
  • US20240255722A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of aligning an optical lens in a LiDAR system includes emitting an optical beam by an optical source. The method includes placing the optical lens in front of a photodetector at a first predetermined position. The method further includes moving the optical lens to a plurality of Z-positions along a direction of an optical axis, the plurality of Z-positions corresponding to a plurality of parameter values of the LO signal. The method further includes generating a fitting function based on a set of values of the LO signal; and determining a parameter value of the LO signal for each Z-position. The method includes determining an initial Z-axis position of the optical lens by selecting a Z-position from the plurality of Z-positions based on a plurality of parameter values. The method includes determining a final Z-position of the optical lens by adding an offset to the initial Z-axis position.