3D Opacity Grid From LiDAR for Sparse Scene Forecasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous driving systems face challenges in efficiently encoding and forecasting 3D scene geometry using LiDAR data due to its sparse and unstructured nature, lacking effective grid representations that can leverage neural networks for scene forecasting.

Innovation Solution

A method to form a 3D opacity grid by mapping LiDAR points to a grid, employing volume densification and a 3D convolutional network to generate a dense and continuous representation, enabling scene forecasting and other applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If LiDAR data is directly used for scene representation, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to sparse and unstructured data nature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve3D measurement accuracyVSAvoiddata structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the 3D space into a grid of voxels, transforming the unstructured LiDAR points into a structured grid representation. Each voxel can independently represent occupancy or geometric information, converting the sparse point cloud into a more manageable and structured format that neural networks can process effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate representation layer (the 3D grid/voxel map) between the raw LiDAR data and the neural network processing stage. This intermediate structure serves as a mediator that organizes the sparse LiDAR points into a dense, structured format, facilitating easier processing while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If grid-based 3D scene representations are used, then productivity is improved through computational efficiency, but loss of information occurs in sparse regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidspatial information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different processing strategies to different regions of the 3D grid based on their occupancy density. Occupied voxels (containing LiDAR points) are processed to preserve geometric information, while empty voxels are handled differently, allowing the system to maintain computational efficiency in sparse regions without completely losing spatial information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the representation parameters dynamically - using occupancy probability or density values in the grid cells to represent both occupied and unoccupied spaces. This parameter transformation allows the system to maintain information about spatial distribution and density while achieving computational efficiency through the structured grid format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If traditional object detection and pose estimation methods are used, then reliability is improved through robustness, but device complexity increases due to heavy reliance on data annotation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethod robustnessVSAvoidannotation requirement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to generate its own structured 3D representation directly from raw LiDAR data without requiring external annotation or complex preprocessing. The 3D grid is automatically constructed from the point cloud data, allowing the system to serve its own needs for scene understanding without relying on pre-labeled data or complex annotation pipelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/algorithmic approaches (object detection and pose estimation) with a neural network-based approach that directly processes the 3D grid representation. This substitution eliminates the need for complex annotation-based methods while maintaining robustness through learned features from the structured data representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If camera-based occupancy networks are used, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to depth ambiguity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem usabilityVSAvoiddepth measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes camera-based operations with LiDAR-based operations, replacing the optical measurement system with an active sensing system. This substitution eliminates depth ambiguity inherent in camera data while maintaining ease of operation through automated point cloud processing and 3D grid generation from the LiDAR sensor data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250284006A1Lidargrid a 3D opacity grid from lidar for scene forecasting
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20250284006A1 patent drawing
  • US20250284006A1 patent drawing
  • US20250284006A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of forming a three dimensional (3D) opacity grid is provided. The method may map light detection and ranging (LiDAR) points to a grid. The method may employ a volume densification to the grid to generate a 3D opacity grid representing a surrounding scene.