LIDAR Sensor Cleaning System Using Contactless and Wiper Cleaners

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

LIDAR sensors on vehicles are impaired by environmental conditions such as dirt and dust, which can cause blockages that hinder object detection, leading to reduced sensor performance and potentially requiring a shift to non-autonomous vehicle operation.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a sensor base, a rotatable sensor cover with a window, a contactless cleaner (air nozzle or fluid spray nozzle), and a contacting cleaner (wiper) actuated by a processor to maintain sensor clarity, where the contactless cleaner is activated first, and the contacting cleaner is engaged if the opacity threshold is exceeded after the initial cleaning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a contacting cleaner (wiper) is used to clean the sensor window, then cleaning effectiveness is improved, but the risk of mechanical damage and operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor operation reliabilityVSAvoidcleaning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning system is segmented into two distinct components: a contactless cleaner (air nozzle or fluid spray) and a contacting cleaner (wiper). The contactless cleaner handles routine cleaning, while the contacting cleaner is reserved for severe contamination cases, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical wiper system with a contactless cleaning mechanism using air nozzles or fluid spray nozzles. This substitution eliminates mechanical contact with the sensor window, reducing the risk of mechanical damage and simplifying the cleaning system while maintaining effective cleaning capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a contactless cleaner is used to clean the sensor window, then mechanical damage risk is reduced, but cleaning effectiveness for severe contamination decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical damage riskVSAvoidcleaning effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning system dynamically adapts its approach based on contamination severity. The processor monitors sensor performance and automatically switches between contactless cleaning (for light contamination) and contacting cleaner activation (for severe contamination), optimizing both safety and effectiveness in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (air nozzle or fluid spray nozzle) between the cleaning system and the sensor window. This intermediary enables contactless cleaning that effectively removes light contamination without mechanical contact, while severe contamination cases are handled by the contacting cleaner

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the contacting cleaner is activated frequently, then sensor clarity is maintained, but wear on the wiper increases and operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor clarityVSAvoidwiper service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The contactless cleaner performs preliminary cleaning actions to remove light contamination before it accumulates into severe contamination requiring wiper intervention. This preliminary maintenance approach keeps the wiper in reserve, significantly extending its service life while maintaining sensor clarity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cleaning system applies different cleaning methods to different contamination levels: contactless cleaning for superficial contamination and contacting cleaning for severe contamination. This localized approach to cleaning quality optimization reduces unnecessary wiper activation and extends component life

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively maintains sensor clarity by using a combination of contactless and contacting cleaners to reduce opacity on the sensor window, minimizing the need for the contacting cleaner and ensuring continuous object detection and autonomous vehicle operation.

Implementation Method 1

The contactless cleaner may further include an air nozzle directed to the window.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir stream: Jet

Implementation Method 2

The contactless cleaner may further include a cleaning fluid spray nozzle directed to the window.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid spray: Fluid Spray

Implementation Method 3

The contacting cleaner may include a wiper mechanically connected to an actuator.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10569746B2Sensor cleaning system
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10569746B2 patent drawing
  • US10569746B2 patent drawing
  • US10569746B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a sensor base, a sensor cover having a window that is rotatably mounted to the base. The system includes a contacting cleaner and a contactless cleaner. The system further includes a processor that is programmed to actuate, first, the contactless cleaner and, then, upon determining that opacity of the window exceeds a predetermined threshold after actuation of the contactless cleaner, the contacting cleaner.