LiDAR Throw Detection for Cross-Checkpoint Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security systems struggle to efficiently detect and respond to objects being thrown across security checkpoints, particularly in areas like airports and train stations, where individuals attempt to smuggle contraband by throwing items from unsecured to secured zones.

Innovation Solution

A LiDAR-based security system with AI-enhanced object tracking and threat detection, capable of identifying throwing motions, tracking objects, and integrating with surveillance systems to alert personnel and automate responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional security monitoring systems are used, then the system complexity is low, but the detection precision of thrown objects is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple LiDAR sensors with video management systems and artificial intelligence algorithms into an integrated security monitoring system. The LiDAR sensors detect thrown objects by analyzing point cloud data for abnormal motion patterns, while the VMS provides video verification, creating a multi-modal detection system that achieves high precision without requiring overly complex individual components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces AI-powered anomaly detection algorithms as an intermediary between raw LiDAR point cloud data and security personnel. These algorithms automatically identify throwing motions by detecting abnormal arm movements and object trajectories, filtering out false positives and presenting only relevant threats to operators, thereby achieving high detection precision with manageable system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If manual surveillance is used, then the device complexity is low, but the response time to thrown objects is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous real-time monitoring of the security area using LiDAR sensors that constantly scan and analyze the point cloud environment. The AI algorithms are continuously analyzing arm motions and object trajectories before threats materialize, enabling the system to detect and alert security personnel about thrown objects immediately upon detection rather than relying on periodic manual checks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual surveillance with an automated system comprising LiDAR sensors, point cloud processing algorithms, and AI-powered anomaly detection. This substitution eliminates human response delays by providing automated real-time detection and alerting, achieving rapid response times while managing device complexity through modular system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive area coverage is implemented, then the detection capability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the security area into multiple zones monitored by individual LiDAR sensors positioned at strategic locations. Each sensor covers a specific sector and independently analyzes point cloud data for throwing motions. The system segments the monitoring task across multiple sensors rather than requiring one complex omnidirectional system, achieving comprehensive coverage with manageable individual component complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the LiDAR-based detection system to perform multiple functions: detecting thrown objects, tracking object trajectories, identifying throwing motions through arm motion analysis, and integrating with existing video management systems. This multi-functional approach achieves comprehensive detection capability using a unified technology platform rather than requiring separate specialized systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances real-time security by automating surveillance, ensuring continuous threat tracking, improving response times, and preventing contraband smuggling through accurate detection and alerting mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

one or more LiDAR sensors generating a real-time three-dimensional (3D) point cloud representation of a security checkpoint area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiDAR: LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS20250278992A1Throw detection using lidar
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 INDOOR LAB LLC
  • US20250278992A1 patent drawing
  • US20250278992A1 patent drawing
  • US20250278992A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The inventive throw detection system includes a plurality of lidars positioned to cover a predetermined security area, each lidar being wirelessly connected to a computer running a program to monitor the predetermined security area. The program detects when a person throws an object from an unsecured zone to a secured zone, and sends an alert to security.