LiDAR Time-Division Multiplexing for Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing LiDAR devices face interference challenges when multiple units operate simultaneously, affecting the reliability of autonomous vehicles' real-time decision-making and increasing the risk of accidents.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that emit beams of light with specific wavelengths at distinct times, followed by passive periods, to minimize interference between LiDAR devices, using a controller to manage the sequence of emissions and receptions to ensure unique timing patterns for each device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple LiDAR units operate simultaneously in close proximity, then the productivity and coverage of autonomous vehicle sensing is improved, but interference and jamming between units increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensing coverageVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by implementing time-division multiplexing where LiDAR units transmit laser pulses in alternating time slots rather than continuously or simultaneously. Each unit is assigned specific time windows for transmission, creating a periodic pattern that prevents overlap and interference between multiple units while maintaining high sensing productivity across the fleet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamics by making the transmission timing adaptive and configurable. The control system dynamically adjusts the time slots and coordination parameters based on the number of active LiDAR units, their spatial distribution, and operational conditions. This dynamic coordination allows the system to optimize both productivity and interference reduction in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If time division synchronization is used between LiDAR units, then interference is reduced, but the capture rate for each unit decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidcapture rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by implementing periodic action with optimized duty cycles. Each LiDAR unit transmits in periodic time slots that are carefully calibrated to provide sufficient measurement opportunities while preventing overlap. The periodic transmission pattern ensures that each unit maintains an adequate capture rate for reliable sensing while the overall system achieves interference-free operation through coordinated timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic adjustment of time slot durations and frequencies based on operational requirements. When higher capture rates are needed, the control system can increase the frequency or duration of transmission windows for individual units. Conversely, when interference risk is high, it can extend time slots or increase separation between transmissions, dynamically optimizing the balance between capture rate and interference reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If LiDAR units are independently controlled, then ease of operation is improved, but coordination and interference management become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent controlVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where each LiDAR unit reports its operational status, timing information, and detected interference levels to a central or distributed control system. The control system processes this feedback and adjusts the time-division coordination parameters accordingly, sending updated transmission schedules back to the units. This closed-loop feedback enables independent units to operate in a coordinated manner that minimizes interference while maintaining operational autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed with universal coordination protocols that can manage any number of independently controlled LiDAR units regardless of their specific configurations or locations. The same time-division multiplexing framework and communication protocols apply universally across the fleet, enabling easy integration of new units while maintaining interference-free operation through standardized coordination mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Substantially reduces interference among multiple LiDAR devices, enhancing the reliability of autonomous vehicle navigation and reducing the risk of accidents by improving real-time sensing and perception capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) systems are most commonly used sensors which uses laser technology to make precise distance measurements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) device... at least one receiver configured to detect the beam of lights for sensing purposes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11754710B2Measurement device and method of operating therefor
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 SHARPER SHAPE
  • US11754710B2 patent drawing
  • US11754710B2 patent drawing
  • US11754710B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a measurement device. The method includes performing a first measurement, by emitting a first beam of light having a first wavelength, at a first instant of time. The method further introducing a first passive period of time after the first measurement, wherein, during the first passive period of time, no beam of light is emitted. The method further includes performing a second measurement, by emitting a second beam of light having a second wavelength, at a second instant of time, wherein the second wavelength is different than the first wavelength the second instant of time is after the first passive period of time. The method further includes introducing a second passive period of time after the second instant of time, wherein, during the second passive period of time, no beam of light is emitted and the second passive period of time is different from the first passive period of time.