LIDAR Time-Windowing for Precise Long-Range Distance Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing LIDAR devices face challenges in achieving high precision distance measurements over a broad range of distances, particularly beyond 100 meters, while also requiring a large number of frames to maintain spatial accuracy, which increases response time and reduces the number of measurable points.

Innovation Solution

The method involves determining a pulse width for pulsed laser light that is smaller than the maximum time of flight associated with the maximum distance, and dividing the detection time period into consecutive detection time windows, allowing for distance measurements with improved temporal precision and reduced number of frames required.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the pulse width is reduced to improve temporal precision, then measurement precision is improved, but the detection time period becomes insufficient for broad distance ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal precisionVSAvoiddistance range coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The detection time period is divided into multiple consecutive detection time windows, each window corresponding to a specific distance range. This segmentation allows the system to use short pulse widths for high temporal precision while covering broad distance ranges by distributing detection across multiple windows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts which detection time windows are active based on the expected distance range. By making the detection scheme adaptive and dynamic, the system can optimize for both precision and range coverage depending on operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multiple frames are taken to maintain spatial accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/frame-based accumulation approach with a temporal windowing approach. Instead of requiring multiple frames to accumulate sufficient signal, the system uses multiple detection time windows within a single frame to achieve the same measurement precision, thereby reducing response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of time

If the pulse width is reduced to enable single-frame measurements, then response time is improved, but the number of measurable points decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidnumber of measurable points
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds the dimension of temporal windowing to the measurement process. By dividing the detection time period into multiple consecutive windows and assigning each window to measure specific points, the system can maintain a high number of measurable points while using short pulse widths for fast response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables high precision distance measurements over a broad range of distances with a reduced number of frames, improving the overall response time of the LIDAR device and allowing for single-frame measurements with acceptable accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

the time interval between the emission of the laser light and the detection of reflected laser light is proportional with twice the distance to an object of the scene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

detecting reflected laser light in a detector generally located near the laser source that emitted the laser light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4034910B1Method and device for determining distances to a scene
Publication Date: 2025.06.18 XENOMATIX NV
  • EP4034910B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4034910B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4034910B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method and device for determining distances to a scene. The method comprises steps of determining a laser light pulse width PW that is smaller a maximum time of flight TOFmax corresponding to a maximum distance Dmax by using a pulse width reduction factor N such that PW = (TOFmax – TDL) /N wherein TDL is a predefined delay window, determining a pulse frequency FP such that FP ≤ 1/((N+1) x PW + TDL), illuminating the scene with an illuminating pattern comprising a plurality of spatially separated pulsed laser beams having the determined pulse width and frequency, performing the detection as function of time during a detection time period TD divided in M = α x (N+1) consecutive detection time windows, with α ≥ 1, such that TD = M x (PW/α), identifying in what detection time windows reflected laser light is detected and calculating a distance to the scene based on this identification.